• 中文核心期刊要目总览
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)
  • 中国科技论文与引文数据库(CSTPCD)
  • 中国学术期刊文摘数据库(CSAD)
  • 中国学术期刊(网络版)(CNKI)
  • 中文科技期刊数据库
  • 万方数据知识服务平台
  • 中国超星期刊域出版平台
  • 国家科技学术期刊开放平台
  • 荷兰文摘与引文数据库(SCOPUS)
  • 日本科学技术振兴机构数据库(JST)

近布鲁斯特角反射泵浦-探测二维红外光谱的增强因子极限

Limits in Enhancement Factor in Near-Brewster Angle Reflection Pump-Probe Two-Dimensional Infrared Spectroscopy

  • 摘要: 本文分别模拟了在透射条件和近布鲁斯特角反射条件下的二维红外光谱. 在模拟反射的信号增强因子时,考虑了光的色散以及可能的s-光泄露. 模拟显示,色散对二维红外光谱线型的影响较小且易于矫正. 红外偏振片的不完美所造成的s-光泄露会限制增强因子,但是这一极限要远高于现有常规实验所能及的范围. 在现有实验中,真正主要影响现有增强因子的是入射角的精度,现在常用的旋转台可能无法满足高因子所需的精度. 此外,泵浦脉冲和探测脉冲的传统能量比为9∶1,而在反射条件下该比值可能并非最佳,可改为2∶1. 考虑上述各因素,以现有实验条件应该可以实现1000倍的信号增强. 尽管如此,近布鲁斯特角反射法不仅会放大信号本身,也会放大信号固有的噪音,因而适用于噪音与信号本身没有关联、特别是噪音主要由探测脉冲的波动造成的条件. 如果信号的固有噪音占主导,此方法难以提高信噪比. 本文的理论模拟结果与文献中实验结果基本一致,为在布鲁斯特角附近实现更高倍数的信号增强打下了基础.

     

    Abstract: In this work, we simulated 2D infrared spectroscopy (IR) spectroscopy in both transmission geometry and Brewster-angle reflection geometry. Light dispersion and the leakage of s-polarized light are considered in simulating the enhancement factor of the reflection mode. Our simulation shows that the dispersion in reflection will only alter the 2D IR lineshape slightly and can be corrected. Leaking s-polarized light due to imperfectness of IR polarizers in the reflection geometry may limit the enhancement factor, but such limit is above what a typical experiment can reach. In the current experiment, the enhancement factor is mainly limited by the precision of incident angle, for which ordinary rotation stages are probably not adequate enough. Moreover, traditional energy ratio of pump and probe pulses, which is 9:1, may not be ideal and could be changed to 2:1 in the reflection geometry. Considering all the above factors, the enhancement on the order of 1000 is possible in the current experiment. Nevertheless, near-Brewster angle reflection will enhance both the signal and the noise caused by the signal itself, therefore this method only works if the noise is unrelated to the signal, particularly if the noise is caused by the fluctuation in the probe. It cannot improve the signal to noise ratio when the dominate noise is from the signal itself. The theoretical results here agree reasonably well with published experiment results and pave way for realizing even higher enhancement at nearer-Brewster angle.

     

/

返回文章
返回