Advanced Search
Yueqing Zhang, Yao Zhang, Zhen-Chao Dong. Influence of Defect Structures on Intervalley Scattering in Two-dimensional WSe2 Revealed by Double-Resonance Raman Spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2025, 38(1): 25-36. DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2405070
Citation: Yueqing Zhang, Yao Zhang, Zhen-Chao Dong. Influence of Defect Structures on Intervalley Scattering in Two-dimensional WSe2 Revealed by Double-Resonance Raman Spectroscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2025, 38(1): 25-36. DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2405070

Influence of Defect Structures on Intervalley Scattering in Two-dimensional WSe2 Revealed by Double-Resonance Raman Spectroscopy

More Information
  • Corresponding author:

    Yao Zhang, E-mail: zhy2008@ustc.edu.cn

    Zhen-Chao Dong, zcdong@ustc.edu.cn

  • Received Date: May 06, 2024
  • Accepted Date: July 17, 2024
  • Available Online: July 23, 2024
  • Issue Publish Date: February 16, 2025
  • Double-resonance Raman (DRR) scattering in two-dimensional (2D) materials describes the intravalley or intervalley scattering of an electron or a hole excited by incident photons. Although the presence of defects can provide additional momentum and influence the scattering process involving one or two phonons, only the idealized defects without any structural details are considered in traditional DRR theory. Here, the second-order DRR spectra of WSe2 monolayer with different types of defects are calculated involving the combinations of acoustic and optical phonons in the vicinity of K (K) and M points of the Brillouin zone. The electronic band structures are modified due to the presence of defects, and the band unfolding method is adopted to show the bending of valence and conduction bands for the defective WSe2 monolayers. The associated phononic band structures also exhibit different changes in phonon dispersion curves, resulting in different DRR spectra corresponding to the different types of defects in the WSe2 monolayers. For example, the existence of W vacancy in the WSe2 monolayer would result in downshifts in vibrational frequencies and asymmetrical broadenings in linewidths for most combination modes due to the dramatic changes in contour shape of electronic valleys at K and K. Moreover, the scattering from K to Q is found to be forbidden for the two Se vacancies because of the elevation of conduction band at the Q point. Our work highlights the role of defect structures in the intervalley scattering and may provide better understanding in the underlying physics of DRR process in 2D materials.

  • Two-dimensional (2D) materials such as graphene and transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have drawn broad interests and stimulated many explorations due to their unique physical properties and promising applications [14]. Raman spectroscopy can provide rich information about the chemical structures of 2D materials and have been widely applied in the studies of their fundamental properties [58]. Although the first-order Raman effect associated with the phonon scattering at Γ point (with zero momentum q ≈ 0) has been extensively studied to identify the layer numbers, defects, disorders and strains in 2D TMDs [911], many spectral features are still found to be related with the excitonic properties and cannot be explained by the first-order Raman scattering [12, 13]. Therefore, the second-order Raman scattering involving the scattering of two phonons (or one defect and one phonon) with non-zero momenta (q ≠ 0) and the resonance with the excitonic transition energy should be considered for the assignment of various Raman features especially for the overtone and combination modes [8, 14].

    The double-resonance Raman (DRR) scattering model describes such a second-order Raman process by introducing two distinct electron-phonon scattering pathways to interpret the importance of intravalley or intervalley scattering and phonon momenta [8, 15]. The first process corresponds to the excitation of two phonons with opposite momenta q and −q, which can be observed in both purely and impurely crystalline samples due to the momentum conservation [14, 16]. For example, the combinations of acoustic and optical phonon in the vicinity of K and M points through the intervalley scattering can generate the DRR bands in the Raman spectra of MoS2 [8]. The second process includes the excitation of a phonon (with momentum q ≠ 0) due to the presence of defects in the sample. The presence of defects can break the translation symmetry in perfect lattice structure of crystal and provide additional momentum due to the defect scattering process [6]. Therefore, phonons away from Γ point will be also involved in the Raman scattering for the defective samples, resulting in the observation of Raman peaks from non-Γ Brillouin zones, which is not allowed in a purely crystalline sample [17, 18]. For example, the well-studied D and D' lines in graphene can be well explained by the DRR model, which is generally regarded as the defect-induced Raman peaks [19, 20]. However, in traditional DRR theory, only the idealized defects without any structural details are considered, and the influences of different defect types on the above DRR process are still illusive [9, 17, 20, 21]. Moreover, the electronic band structures, as well as the phonon dispersion relations, are also unchanged when introducing these idealized defects, which might give not entirely correct physical pictures of the electron-phonon interactions and intervalley scattering processes [22].

    In this work, we proposed a theoretical method based on the DRR theory to explain the influence of different types of defects on the second-order Raman spectrum of a tungsten diselenide (WSe2) monolayer. Four types of defects in the WSe2 monolayer including a Se vacancy (VSe), two Se vacancies (V2Se), a W vacancy (VW) and an O substituting for a Se atom (OSe) are considered during the theoretical calculations. The electronic band structures and phonon dispersions of pristine and defective WSe2 monolayers are obtained from first-principles calculations based on density-functional theory (DFT) [23, 24]. In order to demonstrate the changes in the electronic band structures, especially the bending of valence and conduction bands, the band unfolding method [25] is adopted for all the defective WSe2 monolayers to show the effective band structure (EBS) within the same Brillouin zones. The phonon dispersion curves of the defective WSe2 monolayers are also unfolded from the simulated phononic band structures [26, 27], ensuring that the involved phonons are described in the same reciprocal space for different defective monolayers. The second-order Raman spectra are then calculated using the standard DRR theory [20, 28] for the intervalley scattering processes of two phonons based on the above calculated electronic and phononic band structures. The full 2D Brillouin zone of electronic bands and all possible phonons with adequate wave vectors are considered during the electronic summation in Raman tensor calculations. Due to different influences on the electronic and phononic band structures, different phonon contributions following different pathways are found for the WSe2 monolayers with different defect types, which may provide valuable insights in the mechanisms of high-order Raman scattering for 2D materials.

    Different from the first-order Raman scattering where only the phonons in the vicinity of the Γ point (with zero momentum q ≈ 0) of the Brillouin zone contribute most to the Raman intensities, DRR describes the second-order Raman scattering process that involves the resonant intravalley or intervalley scattering of excited electrons by two phonons or one phonon and one defect with non-zero momenta (q ≠ 0) [5, 1416, 20, 29]. Although the original DRR theory is developed for explaining the appearance of D, D' and 2D lines in graphene, it can be generalized to other 2D materials and interpret the roles of electron-photon and electron-phonon couplings during the Raman scattering when the excitionic transitions are taken into account [8, 9, 14, 28, 30]. For a representative 2D TMDs of a WSe2 monolayer shown in FIG. 1(a), different from the first-order Raman scattering where only one electron or hole is scattered by a phonon (FIG. 1(b)), four typical pathways involving two phonons are considering for the DRR scattering: ee process with only conduction electron involved, hh process with only valence hole involved, eh and he processes with both electron and hole involved [20, 28]. As shown in FIG. 1(d), the DRR process begins with an incoming photon creating an electron-hole pair near the K valley. For the ee process, the electron in conduction band is inelastically scattered to the K valley (or the Q valley in FIG. 1(d)) with the emission of a phonon with wave vector –q and energy ω−q. After that, the electron in conduction band of K (or Q) valley is inelastically scattered back to the K valley with the emission of another phonon with opposite wave vector q and energy ωq. Then the electron-hole pair recombines at K valley, emitting a Raman photon with energy ELω−qωq corresponding to the Stokes scattering process. For the hh process, similar intervalley scattering paths involving two phonons are participated, but for the hole in valence band at K valley instead. For the eh and he processes, both the electron in conduction band and the hole in valence band are inelastically scattered with the emission of two phonons with opposite wave vectors q and –q, respectively. Note that for the KQ intervalley scattering, the hh, eh and he processes are not allowed because of the forbiddance of the hole scattering through the Q valence band. Taken all these processes into account, the DRR intensity can be expressed in the form as [8, 28]:

    Figure  1.  (a) Top view and side view of a pristine WSe2 monolayer. The cross-sectional side view is schematically plotted with only two rows of W and Se atoms in the dashed box in the top view. (b) Schema of first-order Raman pathways, in which either the electron or the hole is scattered by a phonon. (c) Schemas of four typical DRR pathways including ee, hh, eh and he processes for the intervalley scattering from K to K. (d) Schema of ee process for the intervalley scattering from K to Q, where all the other processes are not allowed because of the forbiddance of the hole scattering through the Q valence band.

    Ippeh(ω)=|k,q,μ,νMfcMcbMbaMai(ELECk+q+EVk+qωμqωνqiγ2)(ELECk+q+EVkωμqiγ2)(ELECk+EVkiγ2)|2×δ(ωLωωμqωνq),
    (1)

    where Mai=ψa(k)|Hin|ψi(k) and Mfc=ψf(k)|Hout|ψc(k) are the matrix elements from the electron-photon coupling due to the incoming and outgoing photons, Mcb=ψc(k)|Hνep|ψb(k+q) and Mba=ψb(k+q)|Hμep|ψa(k)represent the matrix elements of electron-phonon coupling [8, 28], with μ and ν the phonon branches involved in the intervalley scattering as well as k and q the wave vectors of the electron and the phonon, respectively. EC(V)k(k+q) corresponds to the energies of the related electronic states in conduction and valence bands, and the damping constant γ is related to the finite lifetime of these states. To calculate the Raman intensities, these matrix elements are held constant [8, 28, 29, 31], and a damping constant γ = 0.02 eV is used [8, 28, 31]. FIG. S1 in Supplementary materials (SM) shows the simulated DRR spectra for the pristine WSe2 monolayer with the contribution from four pathways, in which the ee and hh processes (aa process) are dominant in total DRR intensity, with the assignment of major combination bands shown by the side of corresponding peaks. The details of phonon combination analysis are thoroughly discussed below.

    All the first-principles calculations were carried out using Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP) [32, 33]. For the pristine WSe2 monolayer, the primitive cell (PC) contains one W atom and two Se atoms, while for the defective WSe2 monolayers, the 4×4×1 supercells (SCs) are considered. To minimize the van der Waals interactions between adjacent layers, a vacuum of 20 Å was introduced between the layers. The structural optimizations and electronic structure calculations were performed using density functional theory (DFT) with projector augmented wave (PAW) pseudopotentials [34]. The exchange-correlation potential was described by the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) type [35]. The cutoff energy for the wave functions was set to 500 eV. The structural relaxation of the systems was carried out until the force on each atom was less than 0.001 eV/Å using the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) quasi-Newton algorithm [36]. The 9×9×1 Monkhorst-Pack k-point mesh was used in the reciprocal space. To obtain the phonon dispersion relations for the pristine and defective WSe2 monolayers, density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) [37, 38] calculations were performed using a 3×3×1 k-point mesh, and the force constants were obtained through Fourier transformation of the dynamical matrices by using the Phonopy package [39].

    Since the SCs are used during the above simulations to solve the electronic and phononic band structures due to the lattice symmetry breaking resulted from the introduction of defects, the band dispersion curves are folded into the first Brillouin zone of the supercell (SBZ), resulting in an unrecognizable relationship between the energy E and the wave vector k when comparing with the pristine WSe2 monolayer. Therefore, a computational method [2527] is introduced here to map the energy eigenvalues obtained from the calculations for the large SC into an effective band structure (EBS) to recover an approximate E(k) for defects in the same primitive Brillouin zone (PBZ). The main procedure is briefly discussed below.

    A wave vector K in the SBZ is firstly unfolded into a set of wave vectors ki in PBZ if the pairs of ki and the reciprocal lattice vector Gi meet the following relation:

    ki=K+Gi,i=1,,NK
    (2)

    Then the spectral weight PKm(ki) for energy EKm(ki) can be calculated from [25, 40]:

    PKm(ki)=n|Kmkin|2
    (3)

    which represents the probability of finding a set of PC states |kin contributing to the SC state |Km, where |kn and |Km (n and m stand for the band indices) are the eigenvectors of the electronic system of the PC and the SC, respectively. Based on the linear combination relationship between |kn and |Km [4042], PKm(ki) can be further expressed as:

    PKm(ki)=g,gCKm(g+kiK)CKm(g+kiK)δg,g=g|CKm(g+kiK)|2=g|CKm(g+Gi)|2
    (4)

    where g, g are reciprocal lattice vectors of PC, Gi is reciprocal lattice vector of SC, and CKm is the plane wave expansion coefficient of |Km. To unfold a SC E(K) into a PC adapted E(ki), we can calculate the spectral function A(ki, E) from PKm(ki) as

    A(ki,E)=mPKm(ki)δ(EmE)
    (5)

    Similarly, for phonon dispersion relations, a phonon wave vector Q in the SBZ can be unfolded into a set of wave vectors ql in PBZ if the pairs of ql and reciprocal lattice vector Gl meet the relation:

    ql=Q+Gl,l=1,,NQ
    (6)

    Thus the spectral weight PQm(ql) of EQm(ql) can be obtained by constructing the projection operator ˆPl using a finite number of gj symmetrically located near the Γ point in PBZ as

    PQm(ql)=ϕQ|ˆPl|ϕQ=iei(Gl+gj)riNϕsQm(ri)
    (7)

    here

    ˆPl=j,s|wj,s,lwj,s,l|

    and

    |wj,s,l=ei(Gl+gj)riNδs,s

    ϕsQm(ri) represents phonon polarizability vector coefficients, ri is the coordinate of the ith atom, and s=1, 2, 3 correspond to x, y, and z directions respectively. N is the total number of atoms in the SC. The spectral function can be obtained by:

    A(ql,ω)=mPQm(ql)δ(ωmω)
    (8)

    The atomic structures of four representative defects in the WSe2 monolayer including an O substituting for a Se atom (OSe), a Se vacancy (VSe), two Se vacancies (V2Se), and a W vacancy (VW) are shown in FIG. 2(a). In order to demonstrate the influence of different defects, all the electronic band structures of the defective WSe2 have been unfolded into the same PBZ of pristine WSe2 monolayer, shown as the effective band structures (EBS) by the blue dots in FIG. 2(b). The amplified EBS near the K valley is shown in FIG. 2(c). Both the intervalley scatterings from K to K and from K to Q are allowed if the wavelength of the incident laser is smaller than 561 nm ( > 2.21 eV). For the OSe substitutional defect, the calculated EBS is almost consistent with the band structure of pristine WSe2 monolayer in the vicinity of the K valley, when only the valence band is uplifted by 0.10 eV and the band gap decreased to 1.47 eV comparing with pristine WSe2. The Q conduction band (located in the middle of Γ and K) is also elevated by 0.20 eV, leading to the forbiddance of scatterings from K to Q for the excited electron through the conduction bands under the incident light with the wavelength larger than 618 nm ( < 2.01 eV). By removing one and two Se atoms to create the VSe and V2Se defects, noticeable changes in the shapes and energies for the bottom of the conduction band and the top of the valence band are observed, which will significantly affect the intervalley scattering and the DRR spectra. The Q conduction band further moves up to prevent the electron scattering from K to Q through a phonon. The bands related to the defect states are observed in the middle of band gaps (at ~1 eV), which would not be involved in the DRR process since they are far away from the resonance conditions. For the VW defect by removing a W atom in the WSe2 monolayer, both the conduction and valence bands are significantly distorted, and the valance band at K valley is lifted up by 0.41 eV, mixing with the flat bands of the defect states and resulting in different intervalley scattering pathways discussed later. The different influences on the electronic band structure from different defects can be understood from the atom-projected EBS with the projected electronic density of states (PDOS) overlapped with the band structures, as shown in FIG. S2 (SM). For the pristine WSe2 monolayer, both the conduction and valance bands are mainly contributed by the W atoms. Therefore, only substituting or removing Se atoms would not significantly change the primary features of the conduction and valance bands, especially in the vicinity of K valley.

    Figure  2.  (a) Top and side views of pristine and defective WSe2 monolayers, where the WSe2 monolayer with a Se vacancy on the upper layer is denoted as VSe, WSe2 monolayer with an O substituting for a Se on the upper layer is denoted as OSe, WSe2 monolayer with two Se vacancies at the same positions on the upper and lower layers is denoted as V2Se, and WSe2 monolayer with a W vacancy is denoted as VW. The defect sites are highlighted with red dotted circles. The side views are all schematically plotted with only two rows of W and Se atoms, as illustrated by the dashed box in the top view of the pristine WSe2. (b) Calculated unfolded electronic band structures (i.e., EBS) along high-symmetry k points in PBZ for the pristine and defective WSe2 monolayers, with the Fermi level set as 0 eV. The spectral weights are reflected by the size of the blue dots. The red lines are the calculated electronic band structure from the PC of the pristine WSe2 monolayer. (c) The conductance and valence bands in EBS near the K and Q valleys, in which the direct bandgap (Δ) is marked.

    FIG. 3(a, b) show the maps of calculated conduction band minimum and valence band maximum in the first Brillouin zone for the pristine WSe2 monolayer. For the conduction band, the local minima appear at the high symmetric K, K and Q points, enabling the intervalley scattering through KK and KQ for electrons. While for the valence band, the local maxima have the K, K and Γ points, enabling the intervalley scattering through KK and KΓ for holes. Therefore, for the KK intervalley scattering, all four pathways including ee, hh, eh and he processes are allowed. More detailedly, for the ee and eh processes with the laser excitation energies at 594 nm (~2.09 eV), the excited electron with the initial momentum k would form a triangularly distorted closed line surrounding the K point in the conduction band, as the iso-energy contour line shown in FIG. 3(c). Then the electron is scattered by emitting a phonon towards the K point in the conduction band, reaching the second triangularly distorted closed line formed around K. The phonons connecting the pockets around the K and K points pledge to have the wave vector qn. By translating all these nesting vectors qn to the Γ origin point, it can be found that the phonons that satisfy the KK intervalley scattering generally possess the wave vector q~K, where the symbol “~” means in the vicinity of the given high-symmetric point in PBZ. The electron at the K valley in the conduction band can be scattered back to the K valley in the conduction band by emitting a phonon with opposite wave vector −q~K and then recombined with the hole at K valley in the valence band through the ee process, or directly combined with the phonon-scattered hole at K valley in the valence band through the eh process, resulting in the emission of a Stoke Raman photon with energy ELωμ,ν±q. For the hh and he processes, the excited hole (instead of electron) is first scattered along the KK direction through one phonon, and then scattered back to recombine at the K valley or directly combine with the scattered electron at the K valley to generate the Stokes Raman photon. Moreover, based on the collection of all possible phonon wave vectors for the intervalley scattering and the corresponding phonon density of states (PDOS) analyses (FIG. S3 in SM), only those phonons with q ≈ 2k measured from the K point (the outer trigonal ring indicated by the red line in FIG. 3(c)) make the main contributions to the DRR intensities, and the contributions from q ≈ 0 usually vanish due to the quantum interference [8]. The trigonal warping effect presented in FIG. S3 (SM) leads to another significant result: the phonon contributes the most to the KK DRR scattering process in the pristine WSe2 monolayer originating from the KM direction (corresponding to the scattering electrons with initial and final states along the direction). VSe and OSe do not change the direction but increase the degree of trigonal warping, while for V2Se, the trigonal warping effect nearly disappears, thus the scattering contributions are equal in all directions. VW induces trigonal warping in the opposite direction, resulting in a greater contribution from the phonons in the direction, and the initial and final states of the scattering electrons are primarily along the KM direction. In our calculations, all the contributions from possible phonons to the DRR spectra are considered by integrating all possible wave vectors in reciprocal space.

    Figure  3.  (a, b) Calculated conduction band (a) and valence band (b) in the PBZ of pristine WSe2 monolayer. (c, d) The collections of all possible phonon scattering paths contributed in the intervalley scattering KK (c) and KQ (d) by a phonon with the wave vector q for the pristine WSe2 monolayer. The hexagon is the first Brillouin zone. The triangularly distorted contour around K in red represents the electronic states near K that are excited by the incident laser, while the contour around K (c) and M (d) in blue represents the electronic states near K and M that are deexcited by the emission of a photon and the generation of two phonons. The green nesting lines represent a set of phonon vectors that satisfy the KK (c) and KQ (d) intervalley scattering processes by translating all these vectors qn to the Γ point. (e) Calculated unfolded effective conduction (upper panels) and valence (lower panels) bands in the PBZ for the defective WSe2 monolayers with different defects of VSe, OSe, V2Se, VW, respectively. The energies in all plots are the related values corresponding to the conduction band minimum (CBM) and the valence band maximum (VBM) at the corresponding K (or K) points, named as energy above CBM and energy below VBM, respectively.

    On the other hand, for the KQ intervalley scattering in the pristine WSe2 monolayer, only the ee process is allowed because a local minimum rather than a local maximum is formed at the Q point in the valence band (FIG. 3(b)), prohibiting those paths involving hole scattering processes between K and Q valleys. As shown in FIG. 3(d), for the ee process, the phonons connecting the pockets around the K and Q points possess the wave vector q~M. Therefore, different scattering paths and phonon combinations would be involved for the KQ intervalley scattering. Moreover, for the defective WSe2 monolayers containing the above mentioned four representative defects, all their Q conduction bands are elevated comparing with pristine WSe2, as the shallower valleys at Q points shown in the corresponding maps of conduction band minimum in FIG. 3(e). Therefore, for OSe, VSe, and V2Se, which exhibit insignificant reduction in bandgap, the KQ scattering is always forbidden under incident light with the wavelength larger than 620 nm ( < 2.00 eV). However, when the incident light energy is increased (e.g., 594 nm (2.09 eV) used in the DRR simulation), the KQ scattering becomes permissible for OSe and VSe. Conversely, the introduction of W defects results in a notable reduction in the bandgap, thereby facilitating the KQ scattering even at lower excitation energies. Especially, for the V2Se vacancy defect, a new local minimum appears at the Γ point in the conduction band, yielding a new intervalley scattering path through KΓ for all ee, hh, eh and he processes.

    In order to analyze the contributions from different phonons in the pristine and the defective WSe2 monolayers during the DRR process, the corresponding phonon dispersion relations are calculated. FIG. 4(a) shows the phonon dispersion relation of the pristine WSe2 monolayer, with the irreducible representations given for the Γ-point phonon bands. Three Raman-active phonon modes (A1, E and E) at Γ point are shown on the right of FIG. 4(a). The A1 mode corresponds to the out-of-plane vibration of two Se atoms, also labelled as the optical branch ZO2. The E mode is composed of two in-plane vibrations, which are degenerated at Γ point and split into one longitudinal optical (LO2) branch and one transverse optical (TO2) branch, respectively. Similarly, E corresponds to another in-plane vibrational mode composed of two optical branches (LO1 and TO1). Based on above discussions, we will mainly focus on the combination bands of acoustic and optical phonons in the vicinity of K and M points, especially in the region of 300−400 cm−1. It should be noted that although the symmetries and corresponding point groups as well as the related irreducible representations are different at different high-symmetry k points, as labeledin FIG. 4(a), we always use the representations at the Γ point to describe the combination bands for convenience. As shown in FIG. 4(b), for the KK intervalley scattering, the main contributions to the DRR spectra come from four phonon bands at K point: TO2(E) + ZA at ~320 cm−1, LO2(E) + TA at ~340 cm−1, A2 + ZA at ~360 cm−1 and ZO2(A1) + ZA at ~365 cm−1, respectively. While for the KQ intervalley scattering, as shown in FIG. 4(c), the main contributions to the DRR spectra come from three phonon bands at M point: LO1(E) + LA at ~325 cm−1, LO2(E) + LA at ~355 cm−1 and ZO2(A1) + LA at ~380 cm−1. Moreover, based on previous reports, the intervalley scattering at M point would also introduce an overtone mode 2LA(M), which is usually overlapped with the intrinsic A1 and E modes in the first-order Raman spectrum [17, 43]. This overtone mode (e.g. 2LA), together with the contributions from other acoustic combinations (e.g., TA+ZA), also appears in our calculated DRR spectra, as shown in FIG. 4(d, e). It should be noted that each combination mode contributed in the DRR spectra is not only a single peak, but also includes all the contributed phonon bands that satisfy the intervalley scattering conditions in the vicinity of the K or M points.

    Figure  4.  (a) The calculated phonon dispersion of the pristine WSe2 monolayer, with the irreducible representations labelled at high-symmetry points Γ, M and K. The atomic displacements of three Raman-active modes (A1, E and E) at Γ point are shown on the right. (b, c) The dispersion curve of combination bands near the K (b) and M (c) points within the range of 300−400 cm−1. Four combination modes with the major contributions to the DRR spectra are highlighted in red, with the assignment of corresponding phonon modes labelled on each band. (d, e) The calculated DRR spectrum corresponding to the KK (d) and KQ (e) intervalley scattering processes within the range of 160−400 cm−1 due to the excitation of an incident laser with the energy of 2.09 eV (594 nm). The representative peaks of combination or overtone modes with relatively high Raman intensities are highlighted by different colors.

    For the defective WSe2 monolayers, not only the electronic band structures are influenced (as shown in FIG. 2(b)), but also the phonon dispersion relations are also changed due to the existence of different defects. From the unfolded phonon dispersions of defective WSe2 shown in FIG. 5(a), the introduction of a single Se vacancy defect has a significant impact on the optical branch at the Γ point, leading to the significant red shifts for E and E modes by 10 cm−1. The A1 and A2 modes are also red-shifted by 4 cm–1. For the phonon modes at the M and K points, both the acoustic and optical branches would be influenced by the existence of the Se vacancy. For example, the LA mode is red-shifted by 2 cm−1 at the K point, while the LO2 mode is red-shifted by 8 cm−1 at the M point and 8 cm−1 at the K point. On the contrary, if the Se vacancy is substituted by a single O atom, most of the phonon bands are not shifted. For example, only the A2 mode is red-shifted by 4 cm−1 at the Γ and M points. At the K point, both the A2 and LO2 modes are red-shifted by 4 cm−1, while the LA and TA modes are blue-shifted by 2 cm−1. Moreover, a local vibrational mode related with the O atom in the vacancy is observed at ~150 cm−1. By removing two Se atoms to introduce the V2Se vacancy, the E and A2 modes are red-shifted by 10 cm−1 and 13 cm−1 at the Γ point, while the corresponding LO2 branch is nearly degenerated with the A2 mode at the K point and both are red-shifted by 19 cm−1. The acoustic ZA and TA modes at the K point are red-shifted by 6 cm−1 and 3 cm−1. In above analyses, the major features of the phonon dispersion curves are still preserved, allowing us to identify each phonon branch through the comparisons with the phonon dispersion of the pristine WSe2 monolayer. However, by removing one W atom to introduce the VW vacancy, the phonon bands, especially the optical branches, are greatly influenced and mixed with each other due to the defect-induced broken translational symmetry in the PC. Therefore, it would be quite difficult to resolve different phonon band directly from the dispersion relations, and we need to check the vibrational eigenvectors of the phonon bands located near the corresponding phonon modes in the pristine WSe2 monolayer to make sure they refer to the same vibrations. For example, the A2 mode is greatly red-shifted by 20 cm−1 at the Γ point for VW, thus for the M and K points, those phonon bands with similar red shifts should be checked for identifying the same phonon mode, showing a red-shift of 18 cm−1 and 17 cm−1, respectively. The acoustic branches are also greatly influenced, showing the red-shift of 10 cm−1 for LA and ZA modes at both the M and K points. To further calculate the DRR spectra of these defective structures, frequencies of all the acoustic and optical phonons satisfying the intervalley scattering conditions are obtained from the remapping surfaces of the corresponding branches in the unfolded phonon dispersion relations (FIG. S4 in SM).

    Figure  5.  (a) Calculated phonon dispersion relations along high-symmetry k points within the PBZ for four types of defective WSe2 monolayers by using the band unfolding method. The spectral weights are reflected by the size of the blue dots. The red curves are the calculated phonon dispersion relations for the PC of the pristine WSe2 monolayer for comparison. (b) The calculated DRR spectra corresponding to the KK' and KQ intervalley scattering processes corresponding to different defective WSe2 monolayers due to the excitation of an incident laser with the energy of 2.09 eV (594 nm). The peaks of combination or overtone modes with the major contributions are highlighted by different colors. Note that for V2Se, the KQ intervalley scattering is totally forbidden under the current condition, resulting in the absence of the corresponding DRR spectrum.

    FIG. 5(b) presents the simulated DRR spectra for different types of defects at an incident laser energy of 2.09 eV (594 nm). For the KK intervalley scattering, similar to the DRR spectrum of pristine WSe2 monolayer in FIG. 4(d), the main contributions in the DRR spectra of the defective WSe2 monolayers in the range of 300–400 cm−1 arise from the four combination modes in the vicinity of the K point: TO2(E) +ZA, LO2(E) +TA, A2+ZA, and ZO2(A1)+ZA. Based on the unfolded phonon dispersion curves in FIG. 5(a), for the Se vacancy (VSe), the TO2(K) mode is blue-shifted by 3 cm−1 and the ZA(K) mode is red-shifted by 3 cm−1, thus the combination band TO2+ZA at the K point is nearly unchanged when comparing with that in the pristine monolayer. While for the LO2+TA band, it is red-shifted by 8 cm−1 due to the great red shift of the LO2 mode at the K point. For the OSe defect, as we have mentioned above, since most of the phonon bands are not shifted, the DRR spectra mainly resemble the spectra of the pristine WSe2 monolayer. Only slight red-shifts of 4 cm−1 for A2+ZA band and 2 cm−1 for LO2+TA band are observed. For the V2Se vacancy, the A2+ZA band and the LO2+TA band are red-shifted by 30 cm−1 and 20 cm−1, respectively. The overlap of LO2+TA band and TO2+ZA band results in the maximum total intensity of the DRR spectra red-shifting to ~320 cm−1, a phenomenon that can also be observed when the W vacancy is introduced. On the contrary, since both the electronic band structure and the phonon dispersion are significantly changed when the W vacancy (VW) is introduced, the resultant DRR spectra also exhibit distinct features. For example, nearly all the combination bands are red-shifted with broadened linewidths, especially for the LO2+TA band red-shifted by 28 cm−1 and the A2+ZA band red-shifted by 30 cm−1. The broadenings of the peak widths are resulted from the changes of the PDOS distributions for the defective WSe2 monolayers (FIG. S3 in SM).

    For KQ intervalley scattering, the main contributions to the DRR spectra in the range of 300–400 cm−1 come from three combination bands at the M point: LO1(E) +LA, LO2(E) +LA, and ZO2(A1) +LA. For the VSe defect, since both LO2 and LA modes are red-shifted at the M point, the LO2+LA combination band is red-shifted by 10 cm−1 when comparing with that in the pristine monolayer. For the OSe defect, similar to the KK scattering, the DRR spectra mainly resemble the spectra of the pristine WSe2 monolayer. However, the absolute intensities of the spectra are decreased due to the elevation of the Q conduction band. For the V2Se defect, the intervalley scattering from K to Q is totally forbidden under 594 nm illumination due to the further uplift of the Q conduction band. For the VW defect, nearly all the DRR peaks are red-shifted and broadened, the LO2+LA band and the ZO2+LA band are red-shifted by 20 cm−1. In addition, for the wavenumber range smaller than 300 cm−1, the overtone mode 2LA(M) and the combination mode TA(M)+LA(M) also contribute to the DRR spectra, which are usually overlapped with the intrinsic peaks in the first-order Raman spectrum [17, 43].

    In summary, we have calculated the second-order Raman spectra of pristine and defective WSe2 monolayers by using the improved double-resonance Raman scattering model. By considering the influences of different types of defects on the electronic band structures and photon dispersion relations based on the DFT calculations and the band unfolding methods, different phonon contributions following different pathways during the intervalley scattering are found for different defective WSe2 monolayers. Especially, for the KK scattering of the WSe2 monolayer with a W vacancy, both the conduction and valence bands are significantly distorted, resulting in the reverse trigonal warping of the electronic band structures and the changes of phonon scattering directions. As a result, the corresponding DRR spectrum is greatly changed, showing downshifts in vibrational frequencies and asymmetrical broadenings in linewidths for most combination modes. For the KQ scattering of the WSe2 monolayer with two Se vacancies, the conduction band at the Q point is greatly elevated due to the introduction of the defect, and the intervalley scattering from K to Q is totally forbidden under current condition. Our work may provide deeper understanding of the electron-phonon couplings and the roles of defect structures during the intervalley scattering, which are beneficial for the studies of the second-order Raman scattering processes in 2D materials.

    Supplementary materials: Simulated DRR spectra of pristine WSe2 monolayer corresponding to KQ and KK intervalley scattering processes with the contributions from the ee, hh, eh and he paths are shown in FIG. S1. The atom-projected EBS of the pristine WSe2 and the defective WSe2 monolayers with the defect VSe, OSe, V2Se and VW are shown in FIG. S2. The collection of all possible phonon wave vectors and the radial distribution of phonon density of states (PDOS) for the KK intervalley scattering in the pristine WSe2 and the defective WSe2 monolayers with the defect VSe, OSe, V2Se and VW are shown in FIG. S3. Remapping contours of representative acoustic and optical branches in unfolded phonon dispersions for defective WSe2 monolayers, as well as those for the pristine WSe2 monolayer, are shown in FIG. S4.

    This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.22174135, No.21790352), the National Key R&D Program of China (No.2021YFA1500500, No.2016YFA0200600), the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No.XDB36000000), Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies (No.AHY090100), CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (No.YSBR-054), Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (No.2021ZD0303301), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

  • [1]
    P. Ares and K. S. Novoselov, Nano Mater. Sci. 4, 3 (2022). doi: 10.1016/j.nanoms.2021.05.002
    [2]
    A. Gupta, T. Sakthivel, and S. Seal, Prog. Mater. Sci. 73, 44 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.002
    [3]
    M. Turunen, M. Brotons-Gisbert, Y. Y. Dai, Y. D. Wang, E. Scerri, C. Bonato, K. D. Jöns, Z. P. Sun, and B. D. Gerardot, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 219 (2022). doi: 10.1038/s42254-021-00408-0
    [4]
    C. H. Chang, X. F. Fan, S. H. Lin, and J. L. Kuo, Phys. Rev. B 88, 195420 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.195420
    [5]
    A. C. Ferrari and D. M. Basko, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 235 (2013). doi: 10.1038/nnano.2013.46
    [6]
    X. Zhang, X. F. Qiao, W. Shi, J. B. Wu, D. S. Jiang, and P. H. Tan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2757 (2015). doi: 10.1039/C4CS00282B
    [7]
    Q. K. Qian, Z. F. Zhang, M. Y. Hua, G. F. Tang, J. C. Lei, F. F. Lan, Y. K. Xu, R. Y. Yan, and K. J. Chen, Nanotechnology 28, 175202 (2017). doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa6756
    [8]
    W. Q. Zhou, B. Sherwood, Z. C. Ji, Y. C. Xue, F. Du, J. W. Bai, M. Y. Ying, and H. K. Ji, Nat. Commun. 8, 1038 (2017). doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01188-x
    [9]
    S. Mignuzzi, A. J. Pollard, N. Bonini, B. Brennan, I. S. Gilmore, M. A. Pimenta, D. Richards, and D. Roy, Phys. Rev. B 91, 195411 (2015). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.195411
    [10]
    H. Terrones, E. D. Corro, S. Feng, J. M. Poumirol, D. Rhodes, D. Smirnov, N. R. Pradhan, Z. Lin, M. A. T. Nguyen, A. L. Elías, T. E. Mallouk, L. Balicas, M. A. Pimenta, and M. Terrones, Sci. Rep. 4, 4215 (2014). doi: 10.1038/srep04215
    [11]
    C. Rice, R. J. Young, R. Zan, U. Bangert, D. Wolverson, T. Georgiou, R. Jalil, and K. S. Novoselov, Phys. Rev. B 87, 081307 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.081307
    [12]
    E. Del Corro, H. Terrones, A. Elias, C. Fantini, S. M. Feng, M. A. Nguyen, T. E. Mallouk, M. Terrones, and M. A. Pimenta, ACS Nano 8, 9629 (2014). doi: 10.1021/nn504088g
    [13]
    D. Y. Qiu, F. H. Da Jornada, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 216805 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.216805
    [14]
    M. A. Pimenta, E. del Corro, B. R. Carvalho, C. Fantini, and L. M. Malard, Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 41 (2015). doi: 10.1021/ar500280m
    [15]
    C. Thomsen and S. Reich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5214 (2000). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5214
    [16]
    L. M. Malard, M. A. Pimenta, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rep. 473, 51 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003
    [17]
    W. Shi, M. L. Lin, Q. H. Tan, X. F. Qiao, J. Zhang, and P. H. Tan, 2D Mater. 3, 025016 (2016). doi: 10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025016
    [18]
    M. Couzi, J. L. Bruneel, D. Talaga, and L. Bokobza, Carbon 107, 388 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2016.06.017
    [19]
    C. Tyborski, A. Vierck, R. Narula, V. N. Popov, and J. Maultzsch, Phys. Rev. B 97, 214306 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214306
    [20]
    P. Venezuela, M. Lazzeri, and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B 84, 035433 (2011). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.035433
    [21]
    R. N. Gontijo, G. C. Resende, C. Fantini, and B. R. Carvalho, J. Mater. Res. 34, 1976 (2019). doi: 10.1557/jmr.2019.167
    [22]
    A. P. S. Gaur, S. Sahoo, J. F. Scott, and R. S. Katiyar, J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 5146 (2015). doi: 10.1021/jp512540u
    [23]
    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864
    [24]
    W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
    [25]
    V. Popescu and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 85, 085201 (2012). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.085201
    [26]
    F. W. Zheng and P. Zhang, Comput. Phys. Commun. 210, 139 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.09.005
    [27]
    F. W. Zheng and P. Zhang, Comput. Mater. Sci. 125, 218 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.08.036
    [28]
    Q. K. Qian, Z. F. Zhang, and K. J. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 97, 165409 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.165409
    [29]
    J. Maultzsch, S. Reich, and C. Thomsen, Phys. Rev. B 70, 155403 (2004). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.155403
    [30]
    E. del Corro, A. Botello-Méndez, Y. Gillet, A. L. Elias, H. Terrones, S. Feng, C. Fantini, D. Rhodes, N. Pradhan, L. Balicas, X. Gonze, J. C. Charlier, M. Terrones, and M. A. Pimenta, Nano Lett. 16, 2363 (2016). doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05096
    [31]
    A. Berkdemir, H. R. Gutiérrez, A. R. Botello-Méndez, N. Perea-López, A. L. Elías, C. I. Chia, B. Wang, V. H. Crespi, F. López-Urías, J. C. Charlier, H. Terrones, and M. Terrones, Sci. Rep. 3, 1755 (2013). doi: 10.1038/srep01755
    [32]
    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169
    [33]
    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996). doi: 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0
    [34]
    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758
    [35]
    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865
    [36]
    C. G. Broyden, IMA J. Appl. Math. 6, 222 (1970). doi: 10.1093/imamat/6.3.222
    [37]
    S. Baroni, P. Giannozzi, and A. Testa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1861 (1987). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1861
    [38]
    X. Gonze and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 55, 10355 (1997). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.10355
    [39]
    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015). doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.021
    [40]
    L. W. Wang, L. Bellaiche, S. H. Wei, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4725 (1998). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4725
    [41]
    T. G. Dargam, R. B. Capaz, and B. Koiller, Phys. Rev. B 56, 9625 (1997). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.9625
    [42]
    L. Bellaiche, S. H. Wei, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 56, 10233 (1997). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.56.10233
    [43]
    W. J. Zhao, Z. Ghorannevis, K. K. Amara, J. R. Pang, M. Toh, X. Zhang, C. Kloc, P. H. Tan, and G. Eda, Nanoscale 5, 9677 (2013). doi: 10.1039/c3nr03052k
  • Related Articles

    [1]Ting-wei Chen, Ya-nan Hao, Yu-chen Ma. Quasiparticle Band Structures of Defects in Anatase TiO2 Bulk[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2017, 30(6): 771-775. DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/30/cjcp1711217
    [2]Cheng-qian Tang, Ke Lin, Xiao-guo Zhou, Shi-lin Liu. In situ Detection of Amide A Bands of Proteins in Water by Raman Ratio Spectrum[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2016, 29(1): 129-134. DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/29/cjcp1511240
    [3]Qiang-qiang Meng, Jia-jun Wang, Jing Huang, Qun-xiang Li. Impact of Oxygen Vacancy on Band Structure Engineering of n-p Codoped Anatase TiO2[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2015, 28(2): 155-160. DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/28/cjcp1411196
    [4]Yan-ting Yang, Fu-gen Wu, Zhi-gang Wei. First-principles Band Structures Calculation of Tin-phthalocyanine[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2009, 22(5): 497-501. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/22/05/497-501
    [5]Guo-cai Tian, Jian Li, Yi-xin Hua. Simulation Study on the Structure and Dynamics of Water in Sodium Tetrafluoroborate/Water[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2009, 22(5): 460-466. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/22/05/460-466
    [6]Zun-yun Li, Tong-tong Lu, Tian-jing He, Fan-chen Liu, Dong-ming Chen. Resonance Raman Study of Aggregated Meso-tetra(4-pyridinium) porphyrin Diacid[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2009, 22(4): 346-352. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/22/04/346-352
    [7]Qiu-lin Tan, Wen-dong Zhang, Chen-yang Xue, Jun Liu, Jun-hong Li, Ji-jun Xiong. Research on Raman-scattering and Fabrication of Multilayer Thin Film with Different Structures and Components Based on Pt/Ti/Si3N4/SiO2/Si Substrate[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2009, 22(3): 333-338. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/22/03/333-338
    [8]Hai-yun Wang, Hui-min Weng, Xian-yi Zhou. Defect Characterization of 6H-SiC Studied by Slow Positron Beam[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2008, 21(4): 333-338. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/21/04/333-338
    [9]Jiang Guoshun, Song Chunlin, Li Dongcai, Feng Shaojie, Liu Wei, Chen Chusheng. Defect Structure,Electrical Property and Oxygen Permeation of Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3-δ[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2004, 17(1): 75-78. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/17/1/75-78
    [10]Chen Dongming, Cong Difei, He Tianjing, Zhang Yinghui, Liu Fanchen. Resonance Raman Intensities and Structure of S2 State of Nickel(II) Porphyrin by Time-Dependent Approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2001, 14(2): 191-197. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/14/2/191-197
  • Other Related Supplements

Catalog

    Figures(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (178) PDF downloads (36) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return