
Citation: | Qing-yang Fan, Yi-chao Sun, Fang Yang, Yan-xing Song, Xin-hai Yu, Si-ning Yun. C2-Si: a Novel Silicon Allotrope in Monoclinic Phase[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2022, 35(6): 945-956. DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2101022 |
Group 14 elements (C, Si, Ge) exist in various forms of stable and metastable allotropes [1-38], some of which have been widely used in semiconductor industry. Silicon plays an important role in semiconductor materials. In fact, silicon is irreplaceable in the modern semiconductor industry. Silicon is a significant photovoltaic material in the solar energy industry. Silicon is the second most abundant element in the Earth's crust, and much experience has been accumulated in the utilization of silicon.
The fact that c-Si (space group: Fd-3m) is an indirect band gap semiconductor material which limits its application in photoelectric industry. Therefore, it is a significant direction for semiconductor industry to find silicon allotropes with direct band gap. Some silicon allotropes are direct band gap semiconductors, such as tP36-Si [19], h-Si6 [20], and BC8 (Si-Ⅲ) [22], have been discovered through theoretical research and experimental synthesis. Cai et al. [19] have predicted a new silicon allotrope, named tP36-Si, theoretically investigated through first-principle calculations, which has narrow direct band gap which is 0.58 eV. Through X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and Raman spectra, it is proven that tP36-Si has good optical absorption characteristics and potential application prospects in photovoltaic materials. Guo et al. [20] proposed a new silicon allotrope called h-Si6 with three-dimensional silicon structure composed of silicon triangles. h-Si6 is a promising material for electronic device to its small effective mass and large carrier mobility. However, most silicon allotropes are still indirect band gap semiconductors [21, 24, 28, 31-36], such as Si96 [21], t-Si64 [24], C2/m-16 [31], P2221-Si [34], and I926 phase silicon [35, 36]. Fan et al. [24] predicted a new silicon allotrope (t-Si64) with tetragonal symmetry I41/amd space group, they proposed that t-Si64 is an indirect band gap semiconductor with a lower thermal conductivity, so the Si-Ge alloys in the I41/amd phase may be potential thermoelectric materials. Fan el al. [33] studied four silicon allotropes, including one quasi-direct band gap phase (Amm2) with a band gap of 0.74 eV and three indirect band gap phases i.e. C2/m-16, C2/m-20, and I-4) with band 0.56, 0.53, and 1.28 eV. Fan et al. [34] studied the structural, dynamic, elastic, anisotropic and electrical properties of P2221-Si silicon by first principles. Electronic structure studies show that P2221-Si silicon is an indirect semiconductor material with band gap of 0.90 eV. Lee et al. [35, 36] proposed the indirect band gap semiconductor I926 phase silicon and other direct band gap and quasi direct band gap silicon allotropes. The optoelectronic industry is an important industry direction, but there are few silicon allotropes with direct band gap, and the silicon germanium alloy constructed with the same family elements can also adjust its band structure to the direct band gap. Incorporation of germanium into the silicon allotropes successfully made indirect band-gap silicon into Si-Ge alloys with a direct band gap [1, 7, 35, 38-40]. Although C2-Si proposed in this paper is an indirect band gap semiconductor, SiGe alloy with C2 allotrope constructed by germanium may be able to modulate the energy band to direct band, and the absorption capacity of C2-Si in the visible light range is also better than most silicon structures previously reported.
In this work, based on density functional theory (DFT), a novel silicon allotrope, which is called C2-Si, is predicted to possess the space group C2 by the random strategy combined with group and graph theory (RG2) [3, 39]. C2-Si is shown to have an indirect narrow band gap, while the optical absorption ability of C2-Si is the highest among the Si allotropes mentioned in this work, so C2 phase may be used in photoelectric devices and solar cells. In addition, detailed physical properties, such as structural properties, elasticity, anisotropy and electronic properties are investigated through first-principles calculations.
In this work, the Cambridge Serial Total Energy Package (CASTEP) [40] code based on DFT [41, 42] is used for testing the silicon allotrope in the C2 structure. The equilibrium crystal structure is obtained by geometric optimization using the Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno (BFGS) [43] minimization scheme. A plane-wave cut-off energy of 340 eV and less than 2π×0.025 Å−1 Monkhorst-Pack grid for Brillouin zone sampling are used in structural optimization and prediction of properties. The exchange-related potentials are parameterized at the Perdew-Burke Ernzerhof (PBE) level of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) [44]. The phonon spectrum of C2-Si is calculated by density functional perturbation theory (DFPT) [45]. The elastic constants are calculated for the structure optimized by the strain-stress method. The Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) hybrid functional [46] is used for the calculation of the electronic structures of C2-Si. For electronic structures within HSE06 hybrid functional, a plane wave cut-off energy of 910 eV is used for C2-Si, the Norm-conserving pseudopotentials [47] is adopted for electronic band structures calculations, and the Brillouin zones of C2-Si is sampled with 8×2×4 Monkhorst-Pack special k-point grids.
The crystal structure of C2-Si in the C2 phase is plotted in FIG. 1(a). FIG. 1 (b), (c), and (d) show the crystal structures of C2-Si along the a-axis, b-axis, and c-axis, respectively. We use the PBE method to calculate the lattice parameters of c-Si, which are the same as the lattice parameters obtained in experiments, as shown in Table Ⅰ. Thus, the accuracy of the PBE algorithm is proven in this work. The calculated lattice parameters and density of C2-Si, c-Si, and Pm-3m Si at the PBE level are listed in Table Ⅰ. At 0 GPa, for C2-Si, the equilibrium lattice constants calculated at the PBE level are a=5.538 Å, b=17.408 Å, c=10.328 Å, β=119∘, and ρ=2.133 g/cm3. From Table Ⅰ, the density of C2-Si is slightly higher than that of Si64 (1.732 g/cm3), while it is slightly lower than that of c-Si (2.329 g/cm3). The crystal structure of C2-Si includes four-ring, five-ring, six-ring, seven-ring, eight-ring, nine-ring, ten-ring, and eleven-ring, which are shown in FIG. 2. For the four-ring, it is concluded that the Si−Si bonds have two lengths, 2.327 and 2.370 Å, which can prove that the four-ring is symmetric. From FIG. 2, the five-ring, six-ring, seven-ring, and eight-ring have different bond lengths, but their bond lengths are almost equal. Furthermore, the nine-ring and eleven-ring have seven different Si−Si bonds, and the ten-ring has eight different Si−Si bonds.
![]() |
To study the mechanical properties of C2-Si, the elastic constants Cij, bulk modulus BH, shear modulus GH and Young's modulus E of C2-Si, Si64, Si96, c-Si, Si10, Si14, I4/mmm, and h-Si6 are presented in Table Ⅱ. According to the elastic constants (C11, C12, C13, C15, C22, C23, C25, C33, C35, C44, C46, C55, C66) given in Table Ⅱ, the mechanical stability of C2-Si can be estimated. If the allotrope is a stable monoclinic structure, then the elastic constants of C2-Si should satisfy the mechanical stability criteria of monoclinic symmetry. The mechanical stability of C2-Si can be estimated based on the following criteria: C11>0, C22>0, C33>0, C44>0, C55>0, C66>0, [C11+C22+C33+2(C12+C13+C23)]>0, C33C55−C352>0, C44C66−C462>0, C22+C33−2C23>0, C22(C33C55−C352)+2C23C25C35−C232C55−C252C33>0, 2[C15C25(C33C12−C13C23)+C15C35(C22C13−C12C23) +C25C35(C11C23−C12C13)]−[C152(C22C33−C232)+ C252(C11C33−C132)+C352(C11C22−C122)]+gC55>0 [50]. The calculated results show that the elastic constants satisfy the mechanical stability criteria. Therefore, C2-Si is mechanically stable under ambient pressure.
![]() |
The bulk modulus and shear modulus of C2-Si are determined using the Voigt-Reuss-Hill approximation:
BV=19[C11+C22+C33+(C12+C13+C23)] | (1) |
GV=115[C11+C22+C33+3(C44+C55+C66)−(C12+C13+C23)] | (2) |
BR=Ω[a(C11+C22−2C12)+b(2C12−2C11−C23)+c(C15−2C25)+d(2C12+2C23−C13−2C22)+2e(C25−C15)+f]−1 | (3) |
GR=15{4Ω[a(C11+C22+C12)+b(C11−C12−C23)+c(C15+C25)+d(C22−C12−C23−C13)+e(C15−C25)+f]+3[gΩ+C44+C66C44C66−C246]}−1 | (4) |
With a, b, c, d, e, f, g, and Ω in Eq.(3) and Eq.(4) being,
a=C33C55−C352b=C23C55−C25C35 |
c=C13C35−C15C33d=C13C55−C15C35e=C13C25−C15C23f=C11(C22C55−C252)−C12(C12C55−C15C25)+C15(C12C25−C15C22)+C25(C23C35−C25C33)g=C11C22C33−C11C232−C22C132−C33C122+2C12C13C23Ω=2[C15C25(C33C12−C13C23)+C15C35(C22C13−C12C23)+C25C35(C11C23−C12C13)]−[C152(C22C33−C232)+C252(C11C33−C132)+C352(C11C22−C122)]+gC55 |
From Table Ⅱ, the bulk modulus BH of C2-Si is 52 GPa, and the shear modulus GH of C2-Si is 33 GPa. The bulk modulus BH of C2-Si is approximately half that of c-Si, and it is slightly less than those of Si10, Si14 and h-Si6, while the bulk modulus BH of C2-Si is larger than those of Si64, Si96 and I4/mmm Si. The formula of Young's modulus E and Poisson's ratio ν are as follows [49-52].:
E=9BHGH3BH+GH | (5) |
ν=3BH−2GH2(3BH+GH) | (6) |
The ratio of BH/GH as an indication of ductile versus brittle character was proposed by Pugh [53]. A material is characterized as ductile if the BH/GH ratio is greater than 1.75; if the BH/GH ratio is below 1.75, then the material has a brittle character. From Table Ⅱ, it is concluded that Si64 (2.29), Si96 (1.93), I4/mmm (2.53) and h-Si6 (1.76) have the same characteristic of ductilty, whereas C2-Si (1.58), c-Si (1.40), Si10 (1.20) and Si14 (1.22) are characterized as brittle. I4/mmm has the largest ductility and Si10 has the largest brittleness in this work.
The phonon spectrum is an important marker to prove the dynamic stability of materials. To confirm the dynamic stability of Si in the C2 phase, its phonon spectrum is studied in this work. The phonon spectrum of C2-Si is shown in FIG. 3(a). The phonon spectrum shows no imaginary frequency over the entire Brillouin zone, which indicates that C2-Si is dynamically stable [57]. The formation energy of C2-Si and other allotropes (such as, hP30-Si, hP36-Si, Si96, t-Si64, I4/mmm-Si, Si20-T, Im-3m Si, and hP24-Si) are listed in FIG. 3(b).
The formula for calculating the formation energy is as follows:
ΔH=Hnovelphasen1−Hc−Sin2 | (7) |
where n1 is the number of atoms in the new silicon allotrope and n2 is the number of atoms in c-Si. The calculated relative enthalpy of C2-Si is 0.345 eV/atom higher than that of c-Si, while the relative enthalpy of C2-Si is less than those of t-Si64 (0.413 eV/atom) and I4/mmm-Si (0.364 eV/atom), as shown in FIG. 3(b).
It is well known that the electronic structure determines the most basic physical and chemical properties of materials. However, the DFT method usually underestimates the electronic band structure [21]. Considering this problem, Heyd et al. [58] proposed a hybrid functional method that is easier to handle, and the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) functional was generated. The hybrid functional HSE06 is used in the following form [21, 58]:
EHSExc=μEHF,SRx(ω)+(1−μ)EPW91,SRx(ω)+EPW91,LRx(ω)+EPW91c | (8) |
where the HF mixing parameter μ is 0.25 and the screening parameter ω is 0.207 Å−1 [46, 58]. Then, the band structure of C2-Si is calculated with the HSE06 functional, as shown in FIG. 4, and the band gap is 0.716 eV. The band gap of c-Si (1.12 eV [25, 59]) is approximately 1.5 times that of C2-Si. It is clearly found that the results calculated with the HES06 hybrid functional are much larger than those calculated with GGA-PBE. The grey dotted line in the energy band diagram represents the Fermi level (EF). The valence band maximum (VBM) is located at the A point, and the conduction band minimum (CBM) is located at the Z point, which indicates that C2-Si has indirect semiconductor characteristics, so C2-Si is an indirect band gap semiconductor.
If a material is isotropic, its three-dimensional surface constructions of the shear modulus, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio appear as spheres, and the measured performance values of the material in different directions are exactly the same, while the degree of deviation from a sphere reflects the strength of anisotropy. In this work, we list four silicon allotropes, the C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20 and P21/m phases, because all of them have monoclinic symmetry to compare with C2.
As we know, the crystal system is one of the factors that affect the anisotropy of materials. In order to compare all of the five silicon allotropes in detail related to the anisotropy, we use the ratio of the maximum to minimum value (Emax/Emin) to measure the elastic anisotropy in different planes, including (001) plane, (010) plane, (011) plane, (100) plane, (101) plane, (110) plane, and (111) plane. The maximum values, minimum values, and Emax/Emin ratios of the Young's modulus for the C2, C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20, and P21/m silicon allotropes in the seven main planes are given in Table Ⅲ. From Table Ⅲ, the maximum value of C2-Si is 107.98 GPa, the minimum value is 64.34 GPa, and the Emax/Emin ratio is 1.68, which is slightly greater than those of the C2/m-16 (1.43), C2/m-20 (1.52) and P21/m (1.60) silicon allotropes, while it is slightly smaller than that of the C2/c (1.80) silicon allotrope.
![]() |
FIG. 5(a) shows, for the structure in the C2 phase, the 3D surface of the Young's modulus along the x-axis, y-axis and z-axis largely deviates from a spherical shape, which means that the C2 phase is highly anisotropic in Young's modulus. The projections of the Young's modulus onto different planes are demonstrated in FIG. 5(b). Because the minimum and maximum Young's modulus of C2-Si appear in the (010) plane and its Emax/Emin ratio is 1.68, C2-Si has the greatest mechanical anisotropy in the (010) plane. For the (110) plane, the Emax/Emin ratio is 1.35, showing the smallest mechanical anisotropy of C2-Si. The mechanical anisotropy in the Young's modulus of C2-Si follows the order of (010) plane>(100) plane>(011) plane=(101) plane>(111) plane>(110) plane>(001) plane. The greatest Emax/Emin ratio of the C2/c phase is 1.66 in the (101) plane. The largest mechanical anisotropy in the Young's modulus of the C2/m-16, C2/m-20, and P21/m phases appears on the (110) plane, (011) plane, and (001) plane, respectively. In different planes, C2-Si has a larger mechanical anisotropy than these silicon allotropes.
The maximum surfaces of the shear modulus of the C2, C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20, and P21/m phases are shown in FIG. 6(a - e), and the minimum surfaces of the shear modulus are shown in FIG. 6(f - j). From FIG. 6, the C2, C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20 and P21/m silicon allotropes exhibit elastic anisotropy in the 3D surface of the shear modulus. The elastic anisotropy in the shear modulus of different phases is compared based on Gmax/Gmin. The maximum values, minimum values and Gmax/Gmin ratios of the shear modulus for the C2, C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20 and P21/m phases in the seven main planes are given in Table Ⅲ. From Table Ⅲ, the maximum and minimum values of shear modulus of C2-Si are 45.44 GPa and 26.61 GPa, which appear in the (101) plane at the same time. Therefore, for C2-Si, the anisotropy in the (101) plane is greater than that in the other planes. From the overall data of each phase, the largest ratios for the other silicon allotropes are as follows: C2/c (1.65), C2/m-16 (1.57), C2/m-20 (1.68) and P21/m (1.85). It is concluded that the elastic anisotropy of the C2 phase is larger than that of the C2/c and C2/m-16 phases, less than that of the P21/m phase, and equal to that of the C2/m-20 phase. In addition, the 2D representations of the maximum and minimum shear modulus of C2-Si are illustrated in FIG. 6 (k) and (l). As can be seen from FIG. 6 (k) and (l), the figures of the maximum and minimum values of the shear modulus on each plane are not circular, and each plane of C2-Si has different anisotropy. For the (010) plane, the minimum ratio of Gmax/Gmin is 1.34, which shows the minimum elastic anisotropy in the shear modulus of C2-Si. The elastic anisotropy of the C2-Si shear modulus follows the order of (101) plane>(111) plane>(110) plane=(001) plane>(011) plane>(100) plane>(010) plane. It is concluded that the largest elastic anisotropy in the shear modulus of C2/c and P21/m is in the (010) plane and (100) plane. For C2/m-Si16 and C2/m-Si20, the largest ratios are 1.55 and 1.85, respectively.
The 3D surface constructions of the Poisson's ratio of the C2, C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20 and P21/m silicon allotropes are shown in FIG. 7. The maximum surfaces of the Poisson's ratio of the C2, C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20 and P21/m phases are shown in FIG. 7(a-e), and the minimum surfaces of the Poisson's ratio are shown in FIG. 7(f-j). From these 3D surface constructions of Poisson's ratio diagrams, it can be seen that the elastic anisotropy of the C2 phase is slightly greater than that of the C2/c phase and less than that of the C2/m-16, C2/m-20, and P21/m phases. The 2D representations of the maximum and minimum Poisson's ratio of C2-Si are shown in FIG. 7 (k) and (l), which will help us better observe the elastic anisotropy in Poisson's ratio. Here, the magnitude of the elastic anisotropy is calculated by νmax/νmin. The maximum values, minimum values of Poisson's ratio and νmax/νmin ratios for the C2, C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20, and P21/m silicon allotropes in the seven main planes are given in Table Ⅲ. From Table Ⅲ, the maximum Poisson's ratio of C2-Si is 0.43 and the minimum Poisson's ratio of C2-Si is 0.06 in the seven main planes, so the maximum νmax/νmin value is 7.17 in the (010) plane. The νmax/νmin value of C2-Si is larger than those of the C2/c (2.79), C2/m-16 (2.92), C2/m-20 (4.00), and P21/m (5.13) silicon allotropes, which proves that C2-Si has more elastic anisotropy in the Poisson's ratio. C2-Si has the greatest Poisson's ratio in the (010) plane and the smallest Poisson's ratio in the (011) plane. The mechanical anisotropy of C2-Si in Poisson's ratio follows the order of (010) plane>(111) plane=(110) plane>(001) plane>(101) plane>(100) plane>(011) plane. From Table Ⅲ, the largest νmax/νmin ratios of the C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20, and P21/m phases are 2.71, 2.64, 3.89, and 4.67 respectively. The largest elastic anisotropy in the Poisson's ratio of the C2/c, C2/m-16, C2/m-20 and P21/m silicon allotropes is in the (100) and (110) planes, (110) plane, (001) plane, and (110) plane respectively. C2-Si has the largest mechanical anisotropy in Poisson's ratio in the (010) plane.
Regarding the optical properties, we mainly study the absorption ability of the new silicon allotrope for visible light. The absorption spectra of C2-Si in comparison with those of other silicon allotropes are shown in FIG. 8. According to previous studies [20, 60], the absorption ability of c-Si is not as good as that of h-Si6, o-C12 phase, and hP12 phase. We know that the wavelength range from 390 nm to 780 nm is visible light. From FIG. 8, compared with the silicon allotropes in the oC12 phase and hP12 phase, h-Si6 [1, 20], Cmca Si [8, 30], and allotropes in the D239 and D63 phases [35, 36], C2-Si has a stronger absorption ability in the ultraviolet range. Zooming in the visible region, one can find that the absorption ability of C2-Si is the strongest in the visible region, it is stronger than that of h-Si6, oC12 phase, and hP12 phase; while oC12 phase has the weakest absorption ability for visible light, especially in the yellow, orange and red visible light regions. In the near-infrared region with wavelengths over 780 nm, we can still find that C2-Si has a superior absorption ability. In the near-infrared region, the absorption capacity of the other silicon allotropes used for comparison in this work is almost negligible. In the visible and near-infrared regions, the absorption capacity of C2-Si is larger than that of other phases; that is, C2-Si has the largest light absorption range. Although the proposed structure is an indirect band gap, while the absorption ability of C2-Si is the largest in visible region and near-infrared region in this work, which include direct band gap, such as D63, D135, D76 silicon allotropes.
In this work, a new silicon allotrope, C2-Si, is theoretically predicted, and its structural properties, elastic properties, and anisotropy are investigated with first-principles calculations. By studying the elastic constants and phonon spectrum, C2-Si is found to be mechanically stable and dynamically stable. C2-Si is characterized as a brittle material with BH/GH<1.75. From the Young's modulus, the mechanical anisotropy of C2-Si is slightly greater than that of the C2/m-16, C2/m-20, and P21/m silicon allotropes, while it is slightly smaller than that of C2/c. From the shear modulus, the elastic anisotropy of C2 is greater than that of C2/c, and C2/m-16, less than that of P21/m, and equal to that of C2/m-20. C2-Si has the largest anisotropy in Poisson's ratio. According to the 2D surface structure diagrams of the Young's modulus, shear modulus and Poisson's ratio of C2-Si, the (010) plane has the maximum anisotropy in Young's modulus, the (101) plane has the maximum anisotropy in shear modulus, and the (010) plane has the maximum anisotropy in Poisson's ratio. The band structure of C2-Si indicates that it is an indirect and narrow band gap material with the band gap of 0.716 eV within the HSE06 hybrid functional. In addition, the absorption capacity of C2-Si is greater than that of other phases in the visible and near-infrared regions.
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.61804120 and No.61901162), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No.2019TQ0243 and No.2019M663646), the Key Scientific Research Plan of Education Department of Shaanxi Provincial Government (Key Laboratory Project) (No.20JS066), the Young Talent Fund of University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi, China (No.20190110), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2018YFB1502902), and Key Program for International S & T Cooperation Projects of Shaanxi Province (No.2019KWZ-03).
[1] |
Q. Y. Fan, W. Z. Zhang, Y. X. Song, W. Zhang, and S. N. Yun, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 35, 055012 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1361-6641/ab76ae
|
[2] |
W. Zhang, C. C. Chai, Q. Y. Fan, Y. X. Song, and Y. T. Yang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 537, 147885 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147885
|
[3] |
C. Y. He, X. Z. Shi, S. J. Clark, J. Li, C. J. Pickard, O. Y. Tao, C. X. Zhang, C. Tang, and J. X. Zhong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 175701 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.175701
|
[4] |
X. Z. Li and M. J. Xing, Mater. Chem. Phys. 242, 122480 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122480
|
[5] |
Q. Y. Fan, C. S. Li, R. L. Yang, X. H. Yu, W. Zhang, and S. N. Yun, J. Solid State Chem. 294, 121894 (2021). doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2020.121894
|
[6] |
W. Zhang, C. C. Chai, Q. Y. Fan, Y. X. Song, and Y. T. Yang, New J. Chem. 44, 19789 (2020). doi: 10.1039/D0NJ04104A
|
[7] |
Y. X. Song, C. C. Chai, Q. Y. Fan, W. Zhang, and Y. T. Yang, Phys. Scr. 95, 115808 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1402-4896/abbde1
|
[8] |
Q. Y. Fan, J. Xu, W. Z. Zhang, Y. X. Song, and S. N. Yun, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 045709 (2019). doi: 10.1063/1.5095203
|
[9] |
Y. P. Chen, Y. Xie, X. H. Yan, M. L. Cohen, and S. B. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 868, 1 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2020.05.003
|
[10] |
Q. Y. Fan, H. Liu, X. H. Yu, W. Zhang, and S. N. Yun, Results Phys. 19, 103473 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103473
|
[11] |
H. C. Yin, X. Z. Shi, C. Y. He, M. C. Miguel, J. Li, C. J. Pickard, C. Tang, T. O. Yang, C. X. Zhang, and J. X. Zhong, Phys. Rev. B 99, 041405(R) (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.041405
|
[12] |
V. A. Blatov, C. Yang, D. Tang, Q. Zeng, A. A. Golov, and A. A. Kabanov, NPJ Comput. Mater. 7, 15 (2021). doi: 10.1038/s41524-021-00491-y
|
[13] |
W. Zhang, C. C. Chai, Q. Y. Fan, Y. X. Song, and Y. T. Yang, Diam. Relat. Mater. 109, 108063 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.diamond.2020.108063
|
[14] |
Q. Y. Fan, H. Q. Wang, Y. X. Song, W. Zhang, and S. N. Yun, Comput. Mater. Sci. 178, 109634 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109634
|
[15] |
H. Liu, Q. Y. Fan, F. Yang, X. H. Yu, W. Zhang, and S. N. Yun, Chin. Phys. B 29, 106102 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ab9c01
|
[16] |
Z. H. Gong, X. Z. Shi, J. Li, S. F. Li, C. Y. He, T. O. Yang, C. X. Zhang, C. Tang, and J. X. Zhong, Phys. Rev. B 101, 155427 (2020). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.155427
|
[17] |
J. Cheng and Q. D. Zhang, Materials 13, 2079 (2020). doi: 10.3390/ma13092079
|
[18] |
N. Zhou, P. Zhou, J. Li, C. Y. He, and J. X. Zhong, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115425 (2019). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115425
|
[19] |
X. H. Cai, Q. Yang, Y. Pang, and M. Wang, Comput. Mater. Sci. 173, 109441 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109441
|
[20] |
Y. G. Guo, Q. Wang, and Y. K. P. Jena, Sci. Rep. 5, 14342 (2015). doi: 10.1038/srep14342
|
[21] |
Q. Y. Fan, C. C. Chai, Q. Wei, P. K. Zhou, J. Q. Zhang, and Y. T. Yang, Materials 9, 284 (2016). doi: 10.3390/ma9040284
|
[22] |
H. D. Zhang, H. Y. Liu, K. Y. Wei, O. O. Kurakevych, Y. L. Godec, Z. X. Liu, J. Martin, M. Guerrette, G. S. Nolas, and T. A. Strobel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 146601 (2017). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.146601
|
[23] |
W. Zhang, C. C. Chai, Q. Y. Fan, Y. X. Song, and Y. T. Yang, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 32, 355701 (2020). doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab8982
|
[24] |
Q. Y. Fan, R. Niu, W. Z. Zhang, W. Zhang, Y. C. Ding, and S. N. Yun, ChemPhysChem 20, 128 (2019). doi: 10.1002/cphc.201800903
|
[25] |
H. J. Xiang, B. Huang, E. Kan, S. Wei, and X. G. Gong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 118702 (2013). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.118702
|
[26] |
Q. Y. Fan, C. C. Chai, Q. Wei, and Y. T. Yang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 12905 (2016). doi: 10.1039/C6CP00195E
|
[27] |
I. H. Lee, Y. J. Oh, D. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and K. J. Chang, Comput. Phys. Commun. 203, 110 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.02.011
|
[28] |
C. P. Tang, J. Cao, and S. J. Xiong, Phys. B 59, 466 (2015).
|
[29] |
C. G. Bai, C. C. Chai, Q. Y. Fan, Y. Q. Liu, and Y. T. Yang, Materials 10, 441 (2017). doi: 10.3390/ma10040441
|
[30] |
A. Mujica, C. J. Pickard, and R. J. Needs, Phys. Rev. B 91, 214104 (2015). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.214104
|
[31] |
Q. Y. Fan, C. C. Chai, Q. Wei, H. Y. Yan, Y. B. Zhao, Y. T. Yang, X. H. Yu, Y. Liu, M. J. Xing, J. Q. Zhang, and R. H. Yao, J. Appl. Phys. 118, 4870 (2015).
|
[32] |
M. Hu, Z. Wang, Y. Xu, J. Liang, J. Li, and X. Zhu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 26091 (2018). doi: 10.1039/C8CP03165G
|
[33] |
C. E. De Pryor, J. Phys. : Condens. Matter 26, 045801 (2014). doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/26/4/045801
|
[34] |
Q. Y. Fan, C. C. Chai, Q. Wei, Y. T. Yang, Q. Yang, P. Y. Chen, M. J. Xing, J. Q. Zhang, and R. H. Yao, J. Solid. State. Chem. 233, 471 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.11.021
|
[35] |
I. H. Lee, Y. J. Oh, S. Kim, J. Y. Lee, and K. J. Chang, Comput. Phys. Commun. 203, 110 (2016). doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.02.011
|
[36] |
I. H. Lee, J. Y. Lee, Y. J. Oh, S. Kim, and K. J. Chang, Phys. Rev. B 90, 115209 (2014). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.115209
|
[37] |
Q. Y. Fan, C. C. Chai, Q. Wei, K. Q. Wong, Y. Q. Liu, and Y. T. Yang, J. Mater. Sci. 53, 2785 (2018). doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1681-6
|
[38] |
Q. Y. Fan, C. C. Chai, Q. Wei, P. K. Zhou, and Y. T. Yang, Mater. Des. 132, 539 (2017). doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.07.036
|
[39] |
X. Shi, C. He, C. J. Pickard, C. Tang, and J. Zhong, Phys. Rev. B 97, 014104 (2018). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.014104
|
[40] |
S. J. Clark, M. D. Segall, C. J. Pickard, P. J. Hasnip, M. I. J. Probert, K. Refson, and M. C. Payne, Z. Kristallogr. 220, 567 (2005).
|
[41] |
P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864
|
[42] |
W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965). doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
|
[43] |
B. G. Pfrommer, M. Côté, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, J. Comput. Phys. 131, 233 (1997). doi: 10.1006/jcph.1996.5612
|
[44] |
J. P. Perdew, K. Bruke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. 77, 3865 (1996).
|
[45] |
S. Baroni, S. Gironcoli, A. D. Corso, and P. D. Giannozzi, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001). doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.73.515
|
[46] |
A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov, and G. E. Scuseria, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 224106 (2006). doi: 10.1063/1.2404663
|
[47] |
D. R. Hamann, M. Schluter, and C. Chiang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1494 (1979). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1494
|
[48] |
G. Basile, A. Bergamin, G. Cavagenro, G. Mana, E. Vittone, and G. Zosi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3133 (1994). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3133
|
[49] |
R. Hill, Proc Phys. Soc. London 65, 349 (1952). doi: 10.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307
|
[50] |
Q. Y. Fan, Q. Wei, H. Y. Yan, M. G. Zhang, Z. X. Zhang, J. Q. Zhang, and D. Y. Zhang, Comput. Mater. Sci. 85, 80 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.12.045
|
[51] |
W. Zhang, C. C. Chai, Q. Y. Fan, K. Q. Weng, and Y. T. Yang, J. Mater Sci. 53, 9611 (2018). doi: 10.1007/s10853-018-2249-9
|
[52] |
Q. Y. Fan, W. Z. Zhang, S. N. Yun, J. Xu, and Y. X. Song, Chem. Eur. J. 24, 17280 (2018). doi: 10.1002/chem.201803202
|
[53] |
S. F. Pugh, Philos. Mag. 45, 823 (1954). doi: 10.1080/14786440808520496
|
[54] |
R. Gomez-Abal, X. Li, M. Scheffler, and C. Ambrosch-Draxl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 106404 (2008). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.106404
|
[55] |
W. Zhang, C. C. Chai, Q. Y. Fan, Y. X. Song, and Y. T. Yang, Results Phys. 18, 103271 (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103271
|
[56] |
Q. Wei, W. Tong, B. Wei, M. Zhang, and X. Peng, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 19963 (2019). doi: 10.1039/C9CP03128F
|
[57] |
C. Y. He, C. X. Zhang, J. Li, X. Y. Peng, L. J. Meng, C. Tang, and J. X. Zhong, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 9682 (2016). doi: 10.1039/C6CP00451B
|
[58] |
J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003). doi: 10.1063/1.1564060
|
[59] |
K. Sun, S. H. Shen, Y. Q. Liang, P. E. Burrows, S. S. Mao, and D. Wang, Chem. Rev. 114, 8662 (2014). doi: 10.1021/cr300459q
|
[60] |
Q. Q. Wang, B. Xu, J. Sun, H. Y. Liu, Z. S. Zhao, D. L. Yu, C. Z. Fan, and J. L. He, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 9826 (2014). doi: 10.1021/ja5035792
|
[1] | Wei-xiu Pang, Yun-bin Sun, Jian-jun Zhao, Yi Lu. Ab initio Study of Anharmonic Force Field and Spectroscopic Constants for Germanium Dichloride[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2016, 29(6): 657-662. DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/29/cjcp1604076 |
[2] | Ke-dong Wang, Ju Meng. Elastic Low-Energy Electron Collisions with Methanethiol[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2015, 28(6): 716-720. DOI: 10.1063/1674-0068/28/cjcp1505094 |
[3] | Zi-jiang Liu, Xiao-wei Sun, Cai-rong Zhang, Jian-bo Hu, Ting Song, Jian-hong Qi. Elastic Tensor and Thermodynamic Property of Magnesium Silicate Perovskite from First-principles Calculations[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2011, 24(6): 703-710. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/24/06/703-710 |
[4] | Ai-jie Zhang, Guo-zhong He. Quantum Mechanics Rate Constant for the N+ND Reaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2011, 24(5): 547-550. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/24/05/547-550 |
[5] | Ting-ting Sun, Hai-zhu Ma. Elastic Behaviors of Adsorbed Protein-like Chains[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2010, 23(1): 11-17. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/23/01/11-17 |
[6] | Yong Ding, Jun-feng Zhao, Xiang-si Wang, Sha-sha Liu, Feng-cai Ma. Optical Properties of Neutral and Charged Low Band Gap Alternating Copolyfluorenes: TD-DFT Investigation[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2009, 22(4): 389-394. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/22/04/389-394 |
[7] | Guan-fan Chen, Chen-zhong Cao. Effect of Excited-state Substituent Constant on the UV Spectra of 1,4-disubstituted Benzenes[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2009, 22(4): 366-370. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/22/04/366-370 |
[8] | Teng Lu, Tao Chen, Hao-jun Liang. Elastic Behavior of Polymer Chains[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2008, 21(5): 463-468. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/21/05/463-468 |
[9] | Wang Xiaoyun, Zhao Heping, Yan Lin. Calculation of Effective Dielectric Constants of a Simple Cubic Lattice of Conducting Spheres[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2005, 18(6): 967-970. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/18/6/967-970 |
[10] | Gao Yide, Jin Jin, Liu Yunzhen, Zhang Limin, Chen Yang, Chen Congxiang. The Measurements of Quenching Rate Constants of CCI2 (A1B1and a3B1) by Ketones[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics , 2001, 14(3): 257-262. DOI: 10.1088/1674-0068/14/3/257-262 |
1. | Yang, R., Liu, H., Fan, Q. Mechanical and electronic properties of a novel cubic silicon allotrope with direct band gap: First-principles calculation. Chemical Physics, 2025. DOI:10.1016/j.chemphys.2025.112622 |
2. | Jia, M., Fan, Q., Yu, X. et al. Physical performances for six novel Si allotropes in hexagonal 15 and 18 stacking orders. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 2024. DOI:10.1016/j.physb.2024.416256 |
3. | Fan, Q., Sun, Y., Zhao, Y. et al. Group 14 elements in the Cmcm phase with a direct band structure for photoelectric application. Physica Scripta, 2023, 98(1): 015701. DOI:10.1088/1402-4896/aca44b |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |