The article information
- Si-wen Ju, Ning Zhang, Zhi-qiang Wang, Rui-ting Zhang, De-wen Zeng, Xiao-peng Shao, Ke Lin
- 鞠思文, 张宁, 王志强, 张睿挺, 曾德文, 邵晓鹏, 林珂
- Contacted Ion Pairs in Aqueous CuCl2 by the Combination of Ratio Spectra, Difference Spectra, Second Order Difference Spectra in the UV-Visible Spectra†
- 结合除谱, 差谱, 二阶差谱的二氯化铜水溶液中直接接触离子对的紫外可见吸收光谱研究
- Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics, 2017, 30(6): 657-663
- 化学物理学报, 2017, 30(6): 657-663
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1674-0068/30/cjcp1711211
-
Article history
- Received on: November 14, 2017
- Accepted on: December 20, 2017
b. College of Science, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China;
c. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Ion pairing is significant to understand the properties of ionic aqueous solution. It is widely accepted that various ion pairs are formed at the high concentration of ions. The species and the microstructure of ion pairs have been studied with lots of techniques, such as X-ray diffraction [1-3], neutron diffraction [4-6], extended X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy [7], Raman spectroscopy [8], infrared spectroscopy [9-10], photoelectron spectroscopy [11], pump-probe ultrafast spectroscopy [12], electrochemical methods [13, 14], and molecular dynamic simulations [15].
Copper dichloride (CuCl
The other usual technology to study the aqueous CuCl
The absence of the bands at ~230 and ~380 nm may be due to the fact that the absorption bands of [CuCl
In this study, the ratio spectra are developed in the UV-visible spectra. Furthermore, we propose difference spectra and second order difference spectra. Three novel spectra are united to extract the small components in the overlapping spectra. The validity of this method is supported by the numerical simulations. Using this method, the absorption band at ~230 and ~380 nm are distinguished obviously from the UV-visible spectra of aqueous CuCl
CuCl
We use numerical simulation to analyze the ratio spectra, the difference spectra and the second order difference spectra. In the simulation, five Gaussian functions are employed to simulate the overlapping spectrum, according to the following equation,
$\begin{eqnarray} A\left( \lambda \right) = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^5 {{C_i}{\textrm{e}^{ - {{\left( {\frac{{\lambda - {\lambda _0}_i}}{{{\omega _i}}}} \right)}^2}}}} \end{eqnarray}$ | (1) |
Where
The UV-visible absorption spectra of CuCl
![]() |
FIG. 1 UV-visible absorption spectra of CuCl |
As shown in FIG. 1, the band at ~250 nm shifts to ~260 nm with increasing the concentration of CuCl
Different from the two bands in the spectra of thin film of CuCl
The strong spectral overlapping not only exists in UV-visible spectra, but also presents in all the other spectra. Taking Raman spectra as an example, multivariate curve resolution method [32, 33], factor analysis [34, 35], fitting analysis [36] were used to extract the spectral components in the overlapping spectra. Recently, a new method called Raman ratio spectrum was proposed, and it was successfully employed to extract small Raman bands which were overlapped seriously with a strong band [29-31]. The ratio spectrum is obtained by dividing one spectrum by another spectrum at different conditions. These previous studies demonstrate that the ratio spectrum is different from the spectrum. The spectrum denotes the absolute amount of the chemical species, and the ratio spectrum reflects the rate of the amount change. For example, a spectrum is constituted by a big and a weak band. In a particular condition, the intensity of the big band and the weak band is 100 and 1, respectively. In the other condition, the intensity of the big and the weak band is changed to 110 and 2, respectively. Thus, in the traditional spectra, the dominate band is the big band. However, in the ratio spectra, the dominate band is the weak band. Hence then, when a small band is overlapped by the other large bands, and when its rate of the change is different from those of the other large bands, it may be directly distinguished in the ratio spectrum.
The numerical simulation is performed to show whether the ratio spectrum can also be used to extract the small spectral components in the UV-visible spectra. The spectra were simulated with the sum of some Gaussian functions. Using three kinds of weighting factors (Table Ⅰ), we obtained three different spectra, which are shown in FIG. 2. The first spectrum (spectrum Ⅰ) is obtained through adding two strong Gaussian bands at 180 and 260 nm, as shown in FIG. 2(a). Another Gaussian band at 275 nm was added into spectrum Ⅰ to simulate an overlapping spectrum (spectrum Ⅱ), as shown in FIG. 2(b). Furthermore, two small Gaussian bands at 230 and 380 nm were added into spectrum Ⅱ to simulate the spectrum that consisted of weak spectral bands (spectrum Ⅲ), as shown in FIG. 2(c).
![]() |
FIG. 2 Three simulated spectra with different weighting factors. (a) spectrum Ⅰ, (b) Ⅱ, and (c) Ⅲ, which consist of two, three, and five Gaussian bands, respectively. The weak bands at 230 and 380 nm were multiplied by ten times to be directly shown. |
$\begin{eqnarray} R\left( \lambda \right) = \frac{{{A_x}\left( \lambda \right)}}{{{A_\textrm{I}}\left( \lambda \right)}}\end{eqnarray}$ | (2) |
All the three simulated spectra are similar (FIG. 3(a)). We can only observe the band below 200 nm and the band at 260-270 nm in these simulated spectra. The small bands at 230 and 380 nm are not observed, because these bands are overlapped seriously with the strong bands at 180 and 260-270 nm. Here, ratio spectra are employed to extract the weak spectral components from the spectra. Using Eq.(2), the ratio spectra (
![]() |
FIG. 3 (a) Three simulated spectra, (b) the corresponding ratio spectra, and (c) magnification of the ratio spectrum of spectrum Ⅲ. |
Using an obvious characteristic in the ratio spectra, the difference spectra can be obtained easily. In ratio spectra (FIG. 3 (b) and (c)), a constant exists below 220 nm. This is because only one spectral component locates in this spectral region, other bands hardly contribute to this region. Using the constant in the ratio spectra and the following equation, the spectral component below 220 nm can be removed from spectrum Ⅱ and spectrum Ⅲ.
$\begin{eqnarray} A_x'\left( \lambda \right) = {A_x}\left( \lambda \right) - c{A_\textrm{I}}\left( \lambda \right) \end{eqnarray}$ | (3) |
Where
![]() |
FIG. 4 (a) Difference spectra and (b) the second order difference spectrum of the simulated spectra. |
However, some shortages still present in the difference spectra. For example, although the small band at 230 nm is observed in the difference spectrum of spectrum Ⅲ (FIG. 4(a)), it is still overlapped with the nearest strong band. The position of the strongest band is different from any position in Table Ⅰ. Therefore, we define the second order difference spectrum using the following equation:
$\begin{eqnarray} A_x''\left( \lambda \right) = A_x'\left( \lambda \right) - sA_{\textrm{II}}'\left( \lambda \right)\end{eqnarray}$ | (4) |
Where
The above ratio spectra, difference spectra and second order difference spectra are employed to analyze the UV-visible spectra of aqueous CuCl
![]() |
FIG. 5 Ratio spectra of UV-visible spectra of CuCl |
Although the bands of [CuCl
![]() |
FIG. 6 (a) Difference spectra and (b) the second order difference spectra of the UV-visible spectra of CuCl |
The above second order difference spectra demonstrate the difference spectra could be decomposed into two spectral components, as shown in FIG. 7(a). One spectral component contains the band at ~250 nm, which is assigned as the ion pair [CuCl(H
$\begin{eqnarray} r = \frac{{I\left( {{\rm{component }}\ 1} \right)}}{{I\left( {{\rm{component }}\ 2} \right)}} \end{eqnarray}$ | (5) |
Where r is the amount ratio, I is the integral intensity of the corresponding spectral component. The concentration dependent amount ratios are obtained and plotted in FIG. 7(b). It is observed that the amount ratios decrease with the concentration. It demonstrates that the population of [CuCl
![]() |
FIG. 7 (a) The decomposition of the difference spectra at concentration 5 mol/L, (b) the concentration dependent amount ratio of the [CuCl(H |
In this study, we present a novel spectroscopic analytical method to extract small spectral band from overlapping bands. The numerical simulation demonstrates the combination of ratio spectra, difference spectra and second order difference spectra can successfully be used to distinguish the overlapping weak bands. Employing this method, the UV-visible spectra of CuCl
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.21473171, No.21703164, and No.51134007), the National Basic Research Program of China (No.2014CB643401), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.JB160508), and the Huashan Mountain Scholar Program and the 111 Project (No.B17035).
[1] | J. R. Bell, J. L. Tyvoll, and D. Wertz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 95 , 1456 (1973). DOI:10.1021/ja00786a018 |
[2] | J. L. Tyvoll, and D. Wertz, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 36 , 1319 (1974). DOI:10.1016/0022-1902(74)80071-0 |
[3] | M. Magini, J. Chem. Phys. 74 , 2523 (1981). DOI:10.1063/1.441322 |
[4] | P. Salmon, G. Neilson, and J. Enderby, J. Phys. C 21 , 1335 (1988). DOI:10.1088/0022-3719/21/8/010 |
[5] | S. Ansell, R. Tromp, and G. Neilson, J. Phys.:Condens. Matter. 7 , 1513 (1995). DOI:10.1088/0953-8984/7/8/002 |
[6] | N. R. Texler, S. Holdway, G. W. Neilson, and B. M. Rode, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 94 , 59 (1998). DOI:10.1039/a704670g |
[7] | P. Dangelo, E. Bottari, M. R. Festa, H. F. Nolting, and N. V. Pavel, J. Chem. Phys. 107 , 2807 (1997). DOI:10.1063/1.474638 |
[8] | D. Yang, and W. Y. Xu, Spectrosc. Spect. Anal. 31 , 2742 (2011). |
[9] | D. Schroder, L. Duchackova, J. Tarabek, M. Karwowska, K. J. Fijalkowski, M. Oncak, and P. Slavicek, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 , 2444 (2011). DOI:10.1021/ja105408a |
[10] | T. Wende, N. Heine, T. I. Yacovitch, K. R. Asmis, D. M. Neumark, and L. Jiang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 , 267 (2016). DOI:10.1039/C5CP05762K |
[11] | R. Z. Li, C. W. Liu, Y. Q. Gao, H. Jiang, H. G. Xu, and W. J. Zheng, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 , 5190 (2013). DOI:10.1021/ja4006942 |
[12] | K. J. Tielrooij, N. Garcia-Araez, M. Bonn, and H. J. Bakker, Science 328 , 1006 (2010). DOI:10.1126/science.1183512 |
[13] | H. Zhao, J. H. Chang, A. Boika, and A. J. Bard, Anal. Chem. 85 , 7696 (2013). DOI:10.1021/ac4016769 |
[14] | Y. Meng, and A. J. Bard, Anal. Chem. 87 , 3498 (2015). DOI:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00052 |
[15] | R. T. Zhang, and W. Zhuang, J. Chem. Phys. 140 , 054507 (2014). DOI:10.1063/1.4863696 |
[16] | C. DeKock, and D. Gruen, J. Chem. Phys. 44 , 4387 (1966). DOI:10.1063/1.1726648 |
[17] | B. Scholz, H. D. Lüdemann, and E. Franck, Bunsen Gesell. Physikal. Chem. Ber. 76 , 406 (1972). DOI:10.1002/bbpc.v76.5 |
[18] | M. Khan, M. Schwing-Weill, Inorg. Chem. 15 , 2202 (1976). DOI:10.1021/ic50163a041 |
[19] | J. Bjerrum, Acta Chem. Scand. A 41 , 328 (1987). |
[20] | J. Brugger, D. C. McPhail, J. Black, and L. Spiccia, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 65 , 2691 (2001). DOI:10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00614-7 |
[21] | P. De Vreese, N. R. Brooks, K. van Hecke, L. Vvan Meervelt, E. Matthijs, K. Binnemans, and R. van Deun, Inorg. Chem. 51 , 4972 (2012). DOI:10.1021/ic202341m |
[22] | N. Zhang, Q. B. Zhou, X. Yin, and D. W. Zeng, J. Solut. Chem. 43 , 326 (2014). DOI:10.1007/s10953-014-0129-8 |
[23] | H. J. Li, H. B. Yi, and J. J. Xu, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 165 , 1 (2015). DOI:10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.018 |
[24] | L. Trevani, J. Ehlerova, J. Sedlbauer, and P. R. Tremaine, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 35 , 4893 (2010). DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.046 |
[25] | N. Zhang, D. W. Zeng, G. Hefter, and Q. Y. Chen, J. Mol. Liq. 198 , 200 (2014). DOI:10.1016/j.molliq.2014.06.025 |
[26] | F. F. Xia, H. B. Yi, and D. W. Zeng, J. Phys. Chem. A 113 , 14029 (2009). DOI:10.1021/jp909092p |
[27] | F. F. Xia, H. B. Yi, and D. W. Zeng, J. Phys. Chem. A 114 , 8406 (2010). DOI:10.1021/jp1000804 |
[28] | H. B. Yi, F. F. Xia, Q. B. Zhou, and D. W. Zeng, J. Phys. Chem. A 115 , 4416 (2011). DOI:10.1021/jp109723v |
[29] | K. Lin, X. G. Zhou, S. L. Liu, and Y. Luo, Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 26 , 121 (2013). DOI:10.1063/1674-0068/26/02/121-126 |
[30] | C. Q. Tang, K. Lin, X. G. Zhou, and S. L. Liu, Chin. J. Chem. Phys. 29 , 129 (2016). DOI:10.1063/1674-0068/29/cjcp1511240 |
[31] | Y. Wang, W. Zhu, K. Lin, L. Yuan, X. Zhou, and S. Liu, J. Raman Spectrosc. 47 , 1231 (2016). DOI:10.1002/jrs.v47.10 |
[32] | J. Tomlinson-Phillips, J. Davis, D. Ben-Amotz, D. Spangberg, L. Pejov, and K. Hermansson, J. Phys. Chem. A 115 , 6177 (2011). DOI:10.1021/jp111346s |
[33] | B. M. Rankin, D. Ben-Amotz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 , 8818 (2013). DOI:10.1021/ja4036303 |
[34] | J. J. Max, V. Gessinger, C. van Driessche, P. Larouche, and C. Chapados, J. Chem. Phys. 126 , 184507 (2007). DOI:10.1063/1.2717184 |
[35] | J. J. Max, and C. Chapados, J. Chem. Phys. 130 , 124513 (2009). DOI:10.1063/1.3078382 |
[36] | Y. Okazaki, T. Taniuchi, G. Mogami, N. Matubayasi, and M. Suzuki, J. Phys. Chem. A 118 , 2922 (2014). DOI:10.1021/jp412804d |
[37] | M. Barakzehi, S. H. Amirshahi, and S. Peyvandi, M. G. Afjeh. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 30 , 1862 (2013). DOI:10.1364/JOSAA.30.001862 |
b. 中南林业科技大学理学院, 长沙 410004;
c. 中南大学化学化工学院, 长沙 410083