Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics  2016, Vol. 29 Issue (3): 365-368

The article information

Liang Li, Si-chao Xu, Guang-hai Li
李亮, 许思超, 李广海
Epitaxial Growth and Thermoelectric Measurement of Bi2Te3/Sb Superlattice Nanowires
Bi2Te3/Sb超晶格纳米线的外延生长和热电测量
Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics, 2016, 29(3): 365-368
化学物理学报, 2016, 29(3): 365-368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1674-0068/29/cjcp1509194

Article history

Received: September 21, 2015
Accepted: November 23, 2015
Epitaxial Growth and Thermoelectric Measurement of Bi2Te3/Sb Superlattice Nanowires
Liang Lia, Si-chao Xua, Guang-hai Lia, b     
Dated: Received on September 21, 2015; Accepted on November 23, 2015
a. Key Laboratory of Materials Physics, Anhui Key Laboratory of Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology, Institute of Solid State Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;
b. School of Chemistry and Materials Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
Author: Guang-hai Li, E-mail: ghli@issp.ac.cn
Abstract: Superlattice nanowires are expected to show further enhanced thermoelectric performance compared with conventional nanowires or superlattice thin films. We report the epitaxial growth of high density Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowire arrays with a very small bilayer thickness by pulse electrodeposition. Transmission electron microscopy, selected area electron diffraction and high resolution transmission electron microscopy were used to characterize the superlattice nanowires, and Harman technique was employed to measure the figure of merit (ZT) of the superlattice nanowire array in high vacuum condition. The superlattice nanowire arrays exhibit a ZT of 0.15 at 330 K, and a temperature difference of about 6.6 K can be realized across the nanowire arrays.
Key words: Bi2Te3     Superlattice nanowires     Electrodeposition     Thermoelectric     Harman technique    
Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION

There is growing interest in constructing thermoelectric microdevice for harvesting waste energy and refrigerating. The performance of such devices is determined by the efficiency of thermoelectric materials which is directly related to the dimensionless figure of merit ($ZT$): $ZT$=$S$$^2$$\sigma$$T$/$\kappa$,where $S$,$\sigma$,$T$,and $\kappa$ are the Seebeck coefficient,electrical conductivity,absolute temperature,and thermal conductivity,respectively. The nanostructured materials have attracted much attention in thermoelectricity because they were predicated to have higher efficiencies than their bulk counterparts [1, 2, 3, 4]. Studies on Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 [4] and Ge/Si$_{0.5}$Ge$_{0.5}$ [5] superlattice thin films and Si nanowires [6, 7] have shown that these nanostructured materials have an enhanced $ZT$ in comparison with the corresponding bulks. On the other hand,compared to 2D superlattice thin films and 1D nanowires,the zero-dimensional structure of superlattice nanowires which integrates advantages of the enhanced phonon scattering at the interfaces between periodically alternating materials and the higher quantum confinement as well as a sharper density of states may lead to further improvement in $ZT$ [8, 9, 10].

The template-based electrodeposition method is a widely used technique for fabricating nanowire array because it has some advantages such as simple operation,low cost,high controllability. Electrodeposited materials can potentially be integrated into nanogenerators or Peltier coolers [10, 11, 12]. A variety of thermoelectric superlattice nanowires such as Bi/Sb [13],Bi/BiSb [10, 14],BiTe/BiSbTe [9],Bi2Te3/Sb [15],Bi2Te3/Te [16],Bi2Te2Se/Te [17],and Bi2Te3/Bi [18] have been fabricated using this simple technique. For near room temperature applications,the Bi2Te3 related superlattice nanowires are always the best choice. Unfortunately,the Bi2Te3 related superlattice nanowires obtained so far are always polycrystalline [9, 15],which may depress the electrical conductivity of the superlattice nanowires. Although various types of thermoelectric superlattice nanowires have been fabricated,there is still no report on the thermoelectric performance of the above-mentioned superlattice nanowire. In this work,we report the epitaxial growth of Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowires by pulsed electrodeposition and thermoelectric characterization of the nanowire arrays via Harman technique.

Ⅱ. EXPERIMENTS

Anodic alumina membrane (AAM) was prepared using a two-step anodic anodization process as described previously [19, 20, 21, 22]. Electrodeposition was carried out in a three-electrode electrochemical cell,where a piece of graphite,saturated calomel electrode,and Au-sputtered AAMs served as counter,reference and working electrode,respectively. Before electrodeposition,about 2 $\mu $m-length Au nanorods were first deposited in an electrolyte containing 0.005 mol/L HAuCl4$\cdot$4H2O and 0.5 mol/L boric acid. The electrolyte for the deposition of Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowires contained 1 mol/L HNO3,0.008 mol/L Bi(NO3)3$\cdot$5H2O,0.015 mol/L TeO2,0.02 mol/L Sb2O3,and 0.3 mol/L tartaric acid. Cyclic voltammogram (CV) experiments were performed to determine the suitable deposition voltages for the deposition of Bi2Te3 and Sb.

The microstructure and morphology of the nanowires were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM,H-800),selected area electron diffraction (SAED),and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM,JEOL-2010).

The Harman method was used to measure the $ZT$ of the nanowire arrays [23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28]. Before measurement,a top Au electrode segment with a length of about 2 $\mu $m was electrodeposited onto the nanowire tips immediately after the deposition of Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowires,this step is very important to get a highly ohmic contact. As shown in Fig. 1(a),when a DC current $I_\mathrm{DC}$ is applied to the nanowire array,a temperature difference is established across the nanowire array due to the Peltier effect. After the system reaches a steady state,the total measured voltage is the sum of the ohmic and Seebeck voltages [26]:

$ V_\mathrm{tot}=V_\mathrm{ohmic}+V_\mathrm{Seebeck} $ (1)

where $V_\mathrm{ohmic}$ is the voltage drop due to the resistive nature of the nanowires which can be measured using the the AC measurement [26],and $V_\mathrm{Seebeck}$ is the Seebeck voltage induced by Peltier effect. Then the $ZT$ of the nanowire array can be calculated using the following formula [23, 26]:

$ ZT=\frac{V_\mathrm{Seebeck}}{V_\mathrm{ohmic}}=\frac{V_\mathrm{DC}-V_\mathrm{AC}}{V_\mathrm{AC}} $ (2)

where $V_\mathrm{DC}$ and $V_\mathrm{AC}$ is respectively the DC and AC voltage.

FIG. 1 Schematic of the AC and DC measurement of the Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowire array.

The measurement scheme for evaluating the heating or cooling ability of the fabricated superlattice nanowire arrays in air condition is shown in Fig. 2. Briefly,the nanowire array was sandwich between two Cu blocks,and then a continued DC current was applied across the array for about 1 min,a pair of 80 $\mu $m K-type thermocouple wires was attached to the two sides of the array for the measurement of temperature difference $\Delta$$T$.

FIG. 2 Schematic of the measurement for evaluating heating ability of the Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowire array.
Ⅲ. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In Fig. 3,two obvious reduction peaks (the labeled A and B) and three oxidation peaks (C,D,and E) were observed. Peak A at around -0.1 V can be attributed to the deposition of Bi-Te alloy,and the peak B at around -0.35 V accounts for the abundant electrodeposition of a Bi-Sb-Te ternary alloy. We found that the Bi2Te3 binary alloy and Sb elementary can be deposited at the potential of -0.06 and -0.35 V,respectively,and the Bi-Te binary alloys instead of Bi2Te3 binary alloy and Sb elementary were obtained at other potentials. The chemical compositions of the resulted Bi-Te binary alloy and Sb nanowires were measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES,Thermo iCAP 6300). The nanowires deposited at -0.06 V exhibit a composition of 37.1% Bi,2.3% Sb,and 60.6% Te,which is close to the stoichiometric binary alloy Bi2Te3 with a slightly doped-Sb,and the nanowires deposited at -0.35 V have a composition of 3.1% Bi,87.1% Sb,and 9.8% Te,indicating the majority element deposited at this potential is Sb.

FIG. 3 CV curve of the electrolyte at a scan rate of 40 mV/s.

Figure 4(a) shows transmission electron microscopy (TEM,H-800) image of the Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowires pulsed electrodeposited at -0.06 and -0.35 V with the pulse duration 6 and 2 s,respectively. One can see that the average diameter of the nanowires is about 80 nm,and equals to the pore size of the AAM used. Due to the mass difference,the Bi2Te3 and Sb segments can be clearly distinguished by the bright field TEM imaging in which the darker parts with a length of about 12 nm correspond to Bi2Te3 segments and the brighter ones with a length of about 10 nm correspond to Sb segments. The bilayer thickness of Bi2Te3 and Sb segments is about 22 nm,which demonstrating that the Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowires fabricated by above mentioned depositing parameters have very small bilayer thickness. Figure 4(b) shows an HRTEM image taken at the junction region of the Bi2Te3 and Sb segments,and the magnifying image is shown in Fig. 4(c). The observed lattice spacings of 0.38 and 0.5 nm in Fig. 4(c) correspond respectively to the (003) plane of Sb and (006) plane of Bi2Te3,indicating that the single crystalline Sb segment of a rhombohedral phase grows along [003] direction and Bi2Te3 segment of a rhombohedral phase is along [006] direction. Bi2Te3 has the crystal parameters of $a$=0.4417 nm and $c$=2.984 nm,while Sb has the crystal parameters of $a$=0.4307 nm and $c$=1.1273 nm,and both of them belong to the rhombohedral space group R$\bar 3$m [19, 29],from these facts one can conclude that the deposition of the Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowires is truly an epitaxial growth. The presence of double diffraction spots in the corresponding SAED pattern shown in Fig. 4(d) further demonstrates the epitaxial character of the superlattice nanowires.

FIG. 4 (a) TEM image of an individual Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowire, (b) and (c) HRTEM images of the junction of the superlattice nanowire, (d) the corresponding SAED pattern of (a).

The AC and DC measurements were taken at a 1$\times$10$^{-4}$ Pa high vacuum pressure. In order to reach a steady state,a stabilization time of 20 min was used at each temperature before measurement. For DC measurement,the bias current was applied for about 1 min before record the voltage data. Figure 5(a) shows the $I-V$ curves of AC and DC measurements at 300 K,a nearly linear relationship between current and voltage can be clearly seen,indicating a highly ohmic contact of the nanowires. From FIG. 5(b),one can also see that the $V_\mathrm{DC}$ is always higher than $V_\mathrm{AC}$ at the same input current,which is reasonable if one considers the Peltier effect in the thermoelectric superlattice nanowires. Figure 5(b) shows the calculated $ZT$ from 250 K to 330 K from Eq.(2),in which the highest $ZT$ is about 0.15 at 330 K. At 300 K,the measured $ZT$ is only about 0.13 and is much less than the state-of-the-art commercial Bi2Te3 bulk (with $ZT$ of about 1). Several reasons may be responsible for the low $ZT$: (i) the composition of each segment of the superlattice nanowires is not in the optimum region,which further leads the carrier concentration out of the optimum region [30],(ii) the thermal conductivity of AAM cannot be neglected compared to the nanowires [24, 31],and thus the measured $V_\mathrm{Seebeck}$ is always lower than the truly one. In the future,we aim to optimize the performance of the superlattice nanowires by regulating the composition ($i$.$e$.,Bi2Te3/Sb2Te3 superlattice nanowires) and using very low thermal conductivity supporting membrane ($i$.$e$.,ion track Membranes) [32].

FIG. 5 (a) $I$-$V$ curves of the nanowire array at 300 K and (b) temperature dependence of the calculated $ZT$.

Figure 6 shows the temperature difference between the top and back side of the Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowire array to illustrate the heating ability of the thermoelectric microdevice. One can see that $\Delta$$T$ first increases with increasing from zero at applied current of 0.02 A,and then reaches a steady value of about 6.6 K at about 0.16 A,this temperature difference is near the value obtained in hybrid Bi$_{0.3}$Sb$_{0.7}$ nanowire/Bi$_{0.4}$Sb$_{1.6}$Te bulk thermoelectric couple. With further increasing current to over 0.2 A,because of breakdown of the electronic contact,no data can be obtained. This result clearly demonstrates that the Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowire array can create a much larger temperature difference compared to the superlattice nanowire/alumina composite and can be used as potential thermoelectric microdevice.

FIG. 6 The dependence of the temperature difference, $\Delta T$, across the array on applied DC current.
Ⅳ. CONCLUSION

Thermoelectric Bi2Te3/Sb superlattice nanowires with a very small bilayer thickness have been grown by pulse electrodeposition technique. The highest $ZT$ of the superlattice nanowire arrays measured in high vacuum condition using Harman method was 0.15 at 330 K,and the highest temperature difference across the nanowire arrays in air condition is about 6.6 K. We believe that with further optimizing the growth condition,the superlattice nanowires will have an even high $ZT$ and can be incorporated into a heating or cooling device.

Ⅴ. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11174285).

References
[1] L. D. Hicks and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 47, 16631 (1993).
[2] L. Hicks and M. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 47, 12727 (1993).
[3] L. Li, N. Koshizaki, and G. H. Li, J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 24, 550 (2008).
[4] R. Venkatasubramanian, E. Siivola, T. Colpitts, and B. O'quinn, 597 (2001).
[5] L. F. Llin, A. Samarelli, S. Cecchi, T. Etzelstorfer, E. M. Gubler, D. Chrastina, G. Isella, J. Stangl, J. M. R. Weaver, and P. S. Dobson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 143507 (2013).
[6] A. I. Boukai, Y. Bunimovich, J. Tahir-Kheli, J. K. Yu, W. A. Goddard Iii, and J. R. Heath, Nature 451, 168 (2008).
[7] A. I. Hochbaum, R. Chen, R. D. Delgado, W. Liang, E. C. Garnett, M. Najarian, A. Majumdar, and P. Yang, Nature 451, 163 (2008).
[8] Y. M. Lin and M. S. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev. B 68, 075304 (2003).
[9] B. Yoo, F. Xiao, K. N. Bozhilov, J. Herman, M. A. Ryan, and N. V. Myung, Adv. Mater. 19, 296 (2007).
[10] X. C. Dou, G. H. Li, and H. C. Lei, Nano Lett. 8, 1286 (2008).
[11] N. Peranio, E. Leister, W. Töllner, O. Eibl, and K. Nielsch, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 151 (2012).
[12] L. Li, G. H. Li, X. D. Wang, and Z. M. M. Wang, Nanoscale Thermoelectrics, New York: Springer, (2014).
[13] F. H. Xue, G. T. Fei, B. Wu, P. Cui, and L. D. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 15348 (2005).
[14] X. Dou, G. Li, H. Lei, X. Huang, L. Li, and I. W. Boyd, K149 (2009).
[15] W. Wang, G. Zhang, and X. Li, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 15190 (2008).
[16] W. Wang, X. Lu, T. Zhang, G. Zhang, W. Jiang, and X. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 6702 (2007).
[17] X. L. Li, K. F. Cai, D. H. Yu, and Y. Y. Wang, Superlatt. Microstruct. 50, 557 (2011).
[18] Z. Xue, X. L. Li, and D. M. Yu, Superlatt. Microstruct. 74, 273 (2014).
[19] Y. Zhang, G. H. Li, Y. C. Wu, B. Zhang, W. H. Song, and L. D. Zhang, Adv. Mater. 14, 1227 (2002).
[20] L. Li, Y. W. Yang, X. H. Huang, G. H. Li, R. Ang, and L. D. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 103119 (2006).
[21] L. Li, G. H. Li, Y. Zhang, Y. W. Yang, and L. D. Zhang, 19380 (1998).
[22] L. Li, Y. W. Yang, G. H. Li, and L. D. Zhang, Small 2, 548 (2006).
[23] T. C. Harman, J. Appl. Phys. 29, 1373 (1958).
[24] J. Keyani, A. M. Stacy, and J. Sharp, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 233106 (2006).
[25] D. Pinisetty, M. Gupta, A. B. Karki, D. P. Young, and R. V. Devireddy, J. Mater. Chem. 21, 4098 (2011).
[26] R. Chavez, A. Becker, M. Bartel, V. Kessler, G. Schierning, and R. Schmechel, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 106106 (2013).
[27] T. Favaloro, A. Ziabari, J. H. Bahk, P. Burke, H. Lu, J. Bowers, A. Gossard, Z. Bian, and A. Shakouri, J. Appl. Phys. 11, 034501 (2014).
[28] S. KeunáKim, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 3529 (2014).
[29] L. Li, Y. W. Yang, X. H. Huang, G. H. Li, and L. D. Zhang, Nanotechnology 17, 1706 (2006).
[30] J. H. Zhou, C. G. Jin, J. H. Seol, X. G. Li, and L. Shi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 133109 (2005).
[31] D. A. Borca-Tasciuc and G. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 084303 (2005).
[32] O. Picht, S. Müller, I. Alber, M. Rauber, J. Lensch-Falk, D. L. Medlin, R. Neumann, and M. E. Toimil-Molares, J. Phys. Chem. C 116, 5367 (2012).
Bi2Te3/Sb超晶格纳米线的外延生长和热电测量
李亮a, 许思超a, 李广海a, b     
a. 中国科学院固体物理研究所, 中国科学院材料物理重点实验室, 安徽省纳米材料与技术重点实验室, 合肥 230031;
b. 中国科学技术大学化学与材料科学学院, 合肥 230026
摘要: 通过脉冲电沉积,外延生长出小单元长度的Bi2Te3/Sb超晶格纳米线.借助哈曼方法,测量了超晶格纳米线阵列的热电性能,330 K时的ZT值可达0.15.研究了Bi2Te3/Sb超晶格纳米线阵列器件的制冷或者加热能力,发现器件的上下表面的最大温差可以达到6.6 K.
关键词: Bi2Te3    超晶格纳米线    电沉积    热电    哈曼技术